4.6 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.9 sec
447 ms
Visit rdto.de now to see the best up-to-date RDTO content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rdto.de
Über 30 Jahre im Verkauf tätig, Marketing im Herzen tragend, habe ich immer das Ganze im Blick. So ist z.B. meine Moderationstätigkeit bei verschiedenen
Visit rdto.deWe analyzed Rdto.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rdto.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
1306 ms
213 ms
211 ms
317 ms
315 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Rdto.de, 24% (16 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 15% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rdto.de.
Page size can be reduced by 694.8 kB (40%)
1.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rdto.de main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 837.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RDTO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 401.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 401.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 257.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rdto.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 257.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (48%)
64
33
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RDTO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rdto.de
1306 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.css
213 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css
211 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
317 ms
jquery.validate.js
315 ms
messages_de.js
314 ms
highlight.js
419 ms
jquery.cycle.lite.min.js
418 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.2.pack.js
419 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
522 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js
523 ms
java.js
523 ms
jquery.tweet.js
627 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.min.js
941 ms
styles_2011.css
529 ms
radikaldarts_3g_small.png
415 ms
12362959_1102493866450960_4657477903600787097_o.jpg
54 ms
likebox.php
293 ms
ZdV-_XRUdM0
107 ms
layout2011_r1_c1.png
122 ms
3.png
676 ms
login.png
291 ms
bl.png
407 ms
layout2011_r4_c6.png
406 ms
startseite_r2_c2.png
505 ms
startseite_r3_c6.png
506 ms
printer.png
618 ms
dk_banner_660_2011.png
919 ms
bottom_bg.png
715 ms
layout_vorschlag_r10_c13.png
780 ms
layout_vorschlag_r9_c1.png
818 ms
layout_vorschlag_r10_c1.png
885 ms
layout_vorschlag_r10_c14.png
922 ms
12819464_1156738547693158_7073874534993298165_o.jpg
13 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
30 ms
www-embed-player.js
58 ms
base.js
82 ms
12829062_1155974084436271_2236298968001921910_o.jpg
116 ms
12489185_1125509250816088_4857111899586044360_o.jpg
136 ms
12495946_1153373688029644_4575210684167920424_o.jpg
143 ms
12764493_1142033789163634_1237058499965464602_o.jpg
138 ms
12794757_1154676524566027_2148672689395020320_o.jpg
138 ms
12419181_1117947858238894_8847626684209385656_o.jpg
137 ms
12491897_1116879215012425_4598639926779266195_o.jpg
135 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
87 ms
ad_status.js
133 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
78 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
81 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
76 ms
jGc-59L_9lo.css
112 ms
1kPfZUdGrka.js
120 ms
Yuj_Y8xNH2C.js
135 ms
Mpe38fuBVZ2.js
119 ms
n8qIhCw3vMx.js
134 ms
ga.js
17 ms
__utm.gif
49 ms
425839_359896000710754_426672703_n.jpg
30 ms
263968_226583347375354_8258919_n.jpg
7 ms
1910205_1065359896821580_8519957187830075699_n.jpg
10 ms
10926210_784287241650348_5688397994376288457_n.jpg
11 ms
1001288_748411191838634_1235217574_n.jpg
12 ms
12705773_941806139249655_9137927156164389670_n.jpg
6 ms
12806096_972703996149955_5904691499664208695_n.jpg
10 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
8 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
9 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
2 ms
AmlxWlqMvlv.js
4 ms
rdto.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rdto.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rdto.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rdto.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rdto.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rdto.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RDTO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: