Tools & Wizards About Us
re-aesthetic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

re-aesthetic.com

Re Aesthetic: Wholesale Cosmetics & Beauty Supplies

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

re-aesthetic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit re-aesthetic.com now to see the best up-to-date Re Aesthetic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about re-aesthetic.com

Re-aesthetic is a leader in the distribution of Aesthetic, Orthopedic and Cosmetic Supplies that enable people to live life to its greatest potential.

Visit re-aesthetic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Re-aesthetic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

re-aesthetic.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

re-aesthetic.com

213 ms

re-aesthetic.com

272 ms

mainstyle.css

72 ms

Re-Aesthetic.png

137 ms

Dermal-filler.jpg

373 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Re-aesthetic.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (689 ms) belongs to the original domain Re-aesthetic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Re-aesthetic.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 929.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 929.3 kB
  • After minification 929.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Aesthetic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

  • Original 106.3 kB
  • After minification 106.3 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-aesthetic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (10%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

64

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Aesthetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

re-aesthetic.com

re-aesthetic.com

213 ms

re-aesthetic.com

re-aesthetic.com

272 ms

mainstyle.css

mainstyle.css

72 ms

Re-Aesthetic.png

Re-Aesthetic.png

137 ms

Dermal-filler.jpg

Dermal-filler.jpg

373 ms

Mesotherapy.jpg

Mesotherapy.jpg

378 ms

Peelings.jpg

Peelings.jpg

319 ms

Skincare.jpg

Skincare.jpg

434 ms

Orthopedic-injections.jpg

Orthopedic-injections.jpg

285 ms

Dermal-filler.jpg

Dermal-filler.jpg

284 ms

Mesotherapy.jpg

Mesotherapy.jpg

380 ms

Cosmetics.jpg

Cosmetics.jpg

338 ms

Toxins.jpg

Toxins.jpg

383 ms

Peelings.jpg

Peelings.jpg

402 ms

Orthopedics.jpg

Orthopedics.jpg

435 ms

Aesthetic-Equipment.jpg

Aesthetic-Equipment.jpg

459 ms

Derma-Veil.jpg

Derma-Veil.jpg

455 ms

Restylane.jpg

Restylane.jpg

450 ms

Macrolane.jpg

Macrolane.jpg

466 ms

Galderma.jpg

Galderma.jpg

498 ms

Juvederm.jpg

Juvederm.jpg

499 ms

Surgiderm.jpg

Surgiderm.jpg

518 ms

Natrelle.jpg

Natrelle.jpg

519 ms

Botox-Cosmetic.jpg

Botox-Cosmetic.jpg

522 ms

Allergan.jpg

Allergan.jpg

532 ms

Teosyal.jpg

Teosyal.jpg

564 ms

Teoxane.jpg

Teoxane.jpg

562 ms

Belotero.jpg

Belotero.jpg

582 ms

Radiesse.jpg

Radiesse.jpg

583 ms

Xeomin.jpg

Xeomin.jpg

584 ms

Merz.jpg

Merz.jpg

594 ms

Princess-by-croma.jpg

Princess-by-croma.jpg

626 ms

Croma-Pharma.jpg

Croma-Pharma.jpg

627 ms

Sculptra.jpg

Sculptra.jpg

643 ms

Sinclairpharma.jpg

Sinclairpharma.jpg

646 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

20 ms

jquery.elevatezoom.js

jquery.elevatezoom.js

650 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

660 ms

jquery.eislideshow.js

jquery.eislideshow.js

689 ms

css

css

30 ms

css

css

46 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

621 ms

page.js

page.js

573 ms

Filorga.jpg

Filorga.jpg

460 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQreS2Ao.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQreS2Ao.ttf

15 ms

nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_H-uE0q0EA.ttf

nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_H-uE0q0EA.ttf

49 ms

Stylage.jpg

Stylage.jpg

460 ms

Vivacy.jpg

Vivacy.jpg

427 ms

Derma-Veil.jpg

Derma-Veil.jpg

423 ms

CytoCare.jpg

CytoCare.jpg

389 ms

Revitacare.jpg

Revitacare.jpg

404 ms

RevitaCare.jpg

RevitaCare.jpg

404 ms

Dysport.jpg

Dysport.jpg

409 ms

Ipsen.jpg

Ipsen.jpg

423 ms

Azzalure.jpg

Azzalure.jpg

414 ms

Thermage.jpg

Thermage.jpg

411 ms

Solta-Medical.jpg

Solta-Medical.jpg

397 ms

Fraxel.jpg

Fraxel.jpg

395 ms

Suplasyn.jpg

Suplasyn.jpg

400 ms

Bioniche-Pharma.jpg

Bioniche-Pharma.jpg

436 ms

euflexxa.jpg

euflexxa.jpg

399 ms

Ferring-Pharmaceuticals.jpg

Ferring-Pharmaceuticals.jpg

398 ms

Orthovisc.jpg

Orthovisc.jpg

393 ms

Plasmaconcept.jpg

Plasmaconcept.jpg

401 ms

TRB-Chemedica.jpg

TRB-Chemedica.jpg

407 ms

Smith-Nephew.jpg

Smith-Nephew.jpg

428 ms

Genzyme.jpg

Genzyme.jpg

398 ms

Hyalgan.jpg

Hyalgan.jpg

400 ms

Fidiapharma.jpg

Fidiapharma.jpg

393 ms

trans-black-60.png

trans-black-60.png

423 ms

important.jpg

important.jpg

409 ms

icon_top.png

icon_top.png

430 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

39 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

58 ms

Accessibility Review

re-aesthetic.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

re-aesthetic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

re-aesthetic.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-aesthetic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-aesthetic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

re-aesthetic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Re Aesthetic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: