5.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.3 sec
202 ms
Visit re-bag.com now to see the best up-to-date Re Bag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about re-bag.com
Packaging and bags with a focus on sustainability, environment and climate. Re-bag are experts in reusable bags & reusable packaging for promotional bags, promotional bags and boxes.
Visit re-bag.comWe analyzed Re-bag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
re-bag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
9/100
10%
Value4,080 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.61
10/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
1103 ms
68 ms
80 ms
772 ms
469 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Re-bag.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Re-bag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)
1.8 MB
609.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Re-bag.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Re Bag needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 777.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 777.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-bag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 246.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (68%)
60
19
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Bag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.re-bag.com
1103 ms
css
68 ms
css
80 ms
style.css
772 ms
shortcode.css
469 ms
woocommerce.css
970 ms
responsive.css
532 ms
font-awesome.css
623 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
653 ms
default.css
762 ms
cookiecuttr.css
705 ms
animate.css
1058 ms
classic-081711.css
35 ms
re-bag.css
1041 ms
angular.min.js
1600 ms
jquery-core.js
1519 ms
mc-validate.js
31 ms
jquery-ui.js
1144 ms
jquery-isotope.js
1279 ms
jquery-flexslider.js
1157 ms
jquery-masonry.js
1160 ms
jquery-validate.js
1439 ms
jquery-countTo.js
1422 ms
jquery-countdown.js
1436 ms
jquery-cycle.js
1527 ms
jquery-maximage.js
1625 ms
jquery-waypoints.js
1626 ms
jquery-scrollReveal.js
1660 ms
nivo-lightbox.js
1704 ms
components.js
1699 ms
theme.js
1698 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1776 ms
jquery.cookiecuttr.js
1780 ms
cookieCuttr-en.js
1777 ms
jquery.form.min.js
16 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
7 ms
additional-methods.min.js
7 ms
ngControllers.js
1850 ms
pinit.js
16 ms
re-bag.js
1844 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
re-bag_35-mm.png
500 ms
re-bag_tree.png
586 ms
roundboxes.jpg
501 ms
food-bottles_dec15.jpg
553 ms
bags_dec15.jpg
616 ms
csr_dec15.jpg
615 ms
concepts_dec15.jpg
537 ms
re-bag_35-mm_white.png
570 ms
spinner.gif
1010 ms
SHXJdWnWW6HDq-6DpcG8PxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
68 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9hsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
100 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPUnwhEOjQ2CQgMjdTKA0dzI.woff
100 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
846 ms
analytics.js
162 ms
305 ms
HQXBIwLHsOJCNEQeX9kNzxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
20 ms
Wreg0Be4tcFGM2t6VWytvBGYIVA-f1n-gQW6IKoy_-M.woff
21 ms
pinit_main.js
104 ms
collect
18 ms
12751616_1690254027880108_660603483_n.jpg
59 ms
12547596_183940655304953_58470_n.jpg
28 ms
12523733_136665290047017_1201441664_n.jpg
29 ms
12534277_1491002204539732_1199323343_n.jpg
90 ms
12393589_528785223953577_1399638436_n.jpg
91 ms
300lo.json
37 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
29 ms
re-bag.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
re-bag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
re-bag.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-bag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-bag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
re-bag.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Bag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: