10.6 sec in total
812 ms
9.4 sec
446 ms
Click here to check amazing Re Port content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about re-port.in
A dedicated online portal for purchase and sale of vetted wind and solar energy project reports; provides expert guidance and pointers to identify most profitable renewable energy projects.
Visit re-port.inWe analyzed Re-port.in page load time and found that the first response time was 812 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
re-port.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value240 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.233
54/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
812 ms
4680 ms
1254 ms
509 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Re-port.in, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Re-port.in.
Page size can be reduced by 657.9 kB (22%)
3.0 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Re-port.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Port images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 358.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 358.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-port.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 239.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)
32
18
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Port. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
re-port.in
812 ms
www.re-port.in
4680 ms
jquery.min.js
1254 ms
superfish.js
509 ms
css
16 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1542 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
519 ms
font-awesome.min.css
792 ms
slider_r.css
824 ms
stylesheet.css
1520 ms
responsive.css
1045 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1064 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
854 ms
jquery.adequote.plugins.min.js
1382 ms
jquery.adequote.revolution.js
1943 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1498 ms
site.js
1382 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
collect
11 ms
logo.png
281 ms
main_slider_img_rp.jpg
1765 ms
Banner%20CECL(2).jpg
803 ms
wi_power1.jpg
833 ms
Directory%20add%20in%20WEB%20SITE%202017.jpg
961 ms
ads_part1(1).jpg
548 ms
statistics.png
829 ms
spotlight.png
919 ms
stared.png
1064 ms
Web_banner_Suzlon_2.gif
1099 ms
advertisement_FULL_WIDTH(3).jpg
1110 ms
India%20RE_port%202_6_16.jpg
1762 ms
seller_1.jpg
1718 ms
buyer_1.jpg
2111 ms
info_1.jpg
2376 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
4 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
9 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
9 ms
lato-black-webfont.woff
1436 ms
2HG_tEPiQ4Z6795cGfdivKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
n7G4PqJvFP2Kubl0VBLDEGewmj-_04VMEgCJvu_4mtU.ttf
8 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1Cczai8e7xzqnKiVb1EwOy0E.ttf
8 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1893 ms
loader.gif
1549 ms
timer.png
1504 ms
lato-black-webfont.ttf
673 ms
small_left.png
503 ms
small_right.png
655 ms
lato-black-webfont.svg
318 ms
re-port.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
re-port.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
re-port.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-port.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-port.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
re-port.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Port. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: