9.2 sec in total
60 ms
8.6 sec
576 ms
Visit re-screeningpro.com now to see the best up-to-date Re Screening Pro content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about re-screeningpro.com
Pool screen repair, pool enclosure repair, rescreening, and more in Fort Myers, Cape Coral, Naples, North Fort Myers, and SWFL. Call today for quality, affordable service from the best pros around.
Visit re-screeningpro.comWe analyzed Re-screeningpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
re-screeningpro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
60 ms
86 ms
1663 ms
43 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Re-screeningpro.com, 46% (41 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 24% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 808.6 kB (32%)
2.5 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Re-screeningpro.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 760.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 760.9 kB or 95% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Screening Pro images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 555 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-screeningpro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 555 B or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (77%)
44
10
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Screening Pro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
re-screeningpro.com
60 ms
re-screeningpro.com
86 ms
viewpage.asp
1663 ms
css2
43 ms
css2
60 ms
css2
112 ms
css2
67 ms
css2
65 ms
css2
66 ms
css2
70 ms
css2
77 ms
css2
87 ms
css2
86 ms
css2
86 ms
ecbd179df1.js
56 ms
prefixfree.min.js
36 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
imask
41 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
211 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
210 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
211 ms
jquery.youtube_background.js
210 ms
imask@7.6.1
170 ms
13357_57410_77.jpg
105 ms
13357_59569_33.png
106 ms
13357_57411_33.jpg
102 ms
13357_57413_33.png
103 ms
13357_57414_33.jpg
107 ms
13357_57416_33.png
108 ms
13357_59570_33.png
151 ms
css2
42 ms
css2
38 ms
css2
34 ms
css2
46 ms
css2
23 ms
css2
28 ms
css2
54 ms
css2
64 ms
css2
59 ms
css2
69 ms
css2
78 ms
imask.js
75 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf
57 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf
51 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
66 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
56 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
67 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
80 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf
80 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf
79 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf
81 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
82 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf
85 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
86 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
84 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
87 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
85 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
87 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf
110 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf
109 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf
109 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf
109 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf
109 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUE.ttf
110 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf
112 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf
111 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
85 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBJ.ttf
10 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf
9 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf
10 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf
16 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf
20 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCP.ttf
19 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCP.ttf
17 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CP.ttf
19 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf
19 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf
19 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf
40 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCP.ttf
41 ms
place
5932 ms
player_api
5910 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
5884 ms
js
47 ms
www-widgetapi.js
3 ms
re-screeningpro.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
re-screeningpro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
re-screeningpro.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-screeningpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-screeningpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
re-screeningpro.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Re Screening Pro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: