5.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.4 sec
746 ms
Click here to check amazing Reaction Wheel content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reactionwheel.net
helping the workers own the means of production since 1997
Visit reactionwheel.netWe analyzed Reactionwheel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
reactionwheel.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
1416 ms
127 ms
92 ms
227 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Reactionwheel.net, 20% (15 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Reactionwheel.net.
Page size can be reduced by 420.1 kB (71%)
593.1 kB
173.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Reactionwheel.net main page is 593.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 375.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reaction Wheel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 252.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reactionwheel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (80%)
66
13
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reaction Wheel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reactionwheel.net
1416 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
127 ms
css
92 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
227 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
213 ms
css
136 ms
style.css
213 ms
genericons.css
217 ms
jetpack.css
228 ms
jquery.js
286 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
329 ms
spin.js
349 ms
jquery.spin.js
326 ms
simple-pull-quote.css
336 ms
reactionwheel.net
439 ms
infinity.js
377 ms
jquery.cycle.js
694 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
680 ms
photon.js
417 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
68 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
679 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
680 ms
gprofiles.js
134 ms
wpgroho.js
679 ms
navigation.js
688 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
684 ms
waypoints.min.js
685 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
685 ms
wp-embed.min.js
686 ms
sharing.js
687 ms
e-201613.js
73 ms
ga.js
368 ms
blog-header-img.png
209 ms
loading.gif
222 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
88 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
228 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
230 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
230 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
232 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
230 ms
Genericons.svg
231 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
84 ms
__utm.gif
150 ms
hovercard.css
134 ms
services.css
158 ms
share
368 ms
g.gif
289 ms
graph.facebook.com
319 ms
share
365 ms
graph.facebook.com
384 ms
share
362 ms
graph.facebook.com
382 ms
share
340 ms
graph.facebook.com
416 ms
share
357 ms
graph.facebook.com
397 ms
share
399 ms
graph.facebook.com
394 ms
share
397 ms
graph.facebook.com
393 ms
g.gif
242 ms
g.gif
240 ms
g.gif
240 ms
g.gif
239 ms
g.gif
240 ms
g.gif
264 ms
g.gif
275 ms
g.gif
274 ms
g.gif
275 ms
g.gif
259 ms
g.gif
258 ms
g.gif
277 ms
g.gif
294 ms
g.gif
78 ms
reactionwheel.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
reactionwheel.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reactionwheel.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reactionwheel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reactionwheel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reactionwheel.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reaction Wheel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: