8.8 sec in total
3.5 sec
5 sec
254 ms
Visit readagram.com now to see the best up-to-date Readagram content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about readagram.com
Visit readagram.comWe analyzed Readagram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
readagram.com performance score
3516 ms
47 ms
74 ms
101 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Readagram.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to W.soundcloud.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Readagram.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (49%)
2.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Readagram.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Readagram images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 596.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 596.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 714.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readagram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 714.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (61%)
69
27
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readagram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
readagram.com
3516 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
47 ms
thickbox.css
74 ms
woocommerce.css
101 ms
woocommerce.css
75 ms
css
23 ms
style.css
150 ms
404.css
104 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
80 ms
style.css
111 ms
jetpack.css
115 ms
jquery.js
171 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
137 ms
frontend.js
137 ms
modernizr.min.js
170 ms
webfont.js
17 ms
thickbox.js
167 ms
plugins.js
366 ms
main.js
319 ms
photon.js
316 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
317 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
317 ms
woocommerce.min.js
318 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
319 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
320 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
320 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
css
19 ms
css
18 ms
5MgBikgcWnY
235 ms
245 ms
Eh--J_4Qb6A
244 ms
j3TeLsaKzAM
230 ms
HL-YUTFqtuI
240 ms
nOQc6DopiKQ
225 ms
yK2m-kjhhQM
235 ms
09_slowcarb.png
518 ms
Banner300x250ver1.jpg
281 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
493 ms
risks.png
533 ms
the-lean-startup_50291668aa9bb_w1500.jpg
485 ms
watercolorai_logos2.png
221 ms
photo-1439546743462-802cabef8e97.jpg
484 ms
risks.png
585 ms
09_slowcarb.png
483 ms
cover326x326.jpg
246 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
71 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
114 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
165 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
165 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
171 ms
entypo.svg
193 ms
entypo.woff
143 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
71 ms
www-embed-player.js
90 ms
interstate-0ab59479718c8235122cad6b16a66953d725c43a.css
390 ms
widget-0511d506.css
164 ms
widget-d9304090.js
284 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
192 ms
ad_status.js
216 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
144 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
144 ms
g.gif
113 ms
readagram.com
657 ms
hovercard.css
48 ms
services.css
107 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
49 ms
logo-200x120-177df3dd.png
29 ms
ga.js
17 ms
single-sound-cd67be80.js
60 ms
error-698b3c1d.js
31 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
beacon.js
72 ms
__utm.gif
9 ms
logo_grey-377f1b9e.png
65 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
41 ms
readagram.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readagram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Readagram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readagram.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readagram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: