Tools & Wizards About Us
readandcomment.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

readandcomment.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

286 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

297 ms

readandcomment.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to readandcomment.com homepage info - get ready to check Readandcomment best content right away, or after learning these important things about readandcomment.com

Visit readandcomment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Readandcomment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readandcomment.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

readandcomment.com

286 ms

377 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

99 ms

pagenavi-css.css

183 ms

bootstrap.min.css

281 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Readandcomment.com, 63% (25 requests) were made to Helpfultechnology.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (869 ms) relates to the external source Helpfultechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 439.6 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

843.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Readandcomment.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 833.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 25.9 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 137.3 kB

  • Original 833.9 kB
  • After minification 696.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Readandcomment needs image optimization as it can save up to 137.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 165.1 kB

  • Original 280.9 kB
  • After minification 262.6 kB
  • After compression 115.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.1 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 116.7 kB

  • Original 141.3 kB
  • After minification 137.9 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readandcomment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (64%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readandcomment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

readandcomment.com

readandcomment.com

286 ms

377 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

99 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

183 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

281 ms

css

css

51 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

186 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

187 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

191 ms

master.css

master.css

195 ms

style.css

style.css

273 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

49 ms

wp-google-analytics.js

wp-google-analytics.js

277 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

329 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

50 ms

jquery.mixitup.js

jquery.mixitup.js

334 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

335 ms

jquery.mixitup-pagination.min.js

jquery.mixitup-pagination.min.js

368 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

377 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

377 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

380 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

382 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

46 ms

staticmap

staticmap

308 ms

1f4f7.png

1f4f7.png

58 ms

helpful-header.png

helpful-header.png

169 ms

Screen-Shot-2016-01-13-at-23.04.14-1024x734.png

Screen-Shot-2016-01-13-at-23.04.14-1024x734.png

869 ms

Screen-Shot-2016-01-13-at-23.05.55-300x271.png

Screen-Shot-2016-01-13-at-23.05.55-300x271.png

338 ms

ccs_white_small.png

ccs_white_small.png

247 ms

livingwage.png

livingwage.png

525 ms

fairtax_white.png

fairtax_white.png

169 ms

ga.js

ga.js

23 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

32 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

34 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

271 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

35 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

35 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

89 ms

Accessibility Review

readandcomment.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

readandcomment.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

readandcomment.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readandcomment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readandcomment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

readandcomment.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readandcomment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: