Tools & Wizards About Us
readap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

readap.com

Texas Architectural Experts - Read Architectural Products

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

260 ms

Resources Loaded

779 ms

Page Rendered

101 ms

readap.com screenshot

About Website

Visit readap.com now to see the best up-to-date Read Ap content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about readap.com

Serving Northern & Central Texas Since 1980 With Thousands of Successful Projects. Reach Out To Our Expert Team Today!

Visit readap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Readap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 880 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readap.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

readap.com

260 ms

readap.com

135 ms

css

38 ms

style.min.css

80 ms

menu-animation.min.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Readap.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (329 ms) belongs to the original domain Readap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.7 kB (76%)

Content Size

114.9 kB

After Optimization

27.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Readap.com main page is 114.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 109.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 109.7 kB
  • After minification 107.5 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Read Ap images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (89%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Read Ap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

readap.com

readap.com

260 ms

readap.com

readap.com

135 ms

css

css

38 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

80 ms

menu-animation.min.css

menu-animation.min.css

61 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

57 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

85 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

60 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

78 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

92 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

92 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

114 ms

uael-frontend.min.css

uael-frontend.min.css

165 ms

wpforms-base.min.css

wpforms-base.min.css

230 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

147 ms

post-385.css

post-385.css

133 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

125 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

186 ms

brands.css

brands.css

148 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

185 ms

solid.css

solid.css

198 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

189 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

212 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

243 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

203 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

208 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

250 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

244 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

238 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

291 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

285 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

283 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

309 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

284 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

309 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

309 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

329 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

317 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

30 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xA.woff

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xA.woff

33 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

60 ms

read-blue-final-309x61.png

read-blue-final-309x61.png

58 ms

read-white-final.png

read-white-final.png

28 ms

Accessibility Review

readap.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

readap.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

readap.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

readap.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Read Ap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: