2.7 sec in total
618 ms
1.9 sec
186 ms
Visit reader.travel now to see the best up-to-date Reader content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reader.travel
BOOKING WITH US Just choose one of our great getaways from the collection on the left and then simply relax and enjoy your time away.
Visit reader.travelWe analyzed Reader.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 618 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
reader.travel performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
618 ms
188 ms
49 ms
38 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Reader.travel, 12% (8 requests) were made to Site1.repository.omegaholidays.net and 9% (6 requests) were made to Site2.repository.omegaholidays.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) relates to the external source Repository.omegaholidays.net.
Page size can be reduced by 488.4 kB (24%)
2.0 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Reader.travel main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reader images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 267.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reader.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (27%)
64
47
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reader. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
home.php
618 ms
reader.css
188 ms
left-col-top.gif
49 ms
left-col-searchbox.gif
38 ms
print-button.gif
194 ms
blog_icon.gif
61 ms
facebook_icon.gif
24 ms
datesearch.php
171 ms
WidgetScript
354 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
Travel-image-01.jpg
240 ms
Travel-image-02.jpg
321 ms
bodyguard.jpg
404 ms
exhibitionism.jpg
563 ms
historicpalaces3.jpg
322 ms
ideal.jpg
408 ms
londoneye.jpg
488 ms
muhammadali4.jpg
482 ms
shard1.jpg
484 ms
shard2.jpg
571 ms
show_boat.jpg
570 ms
windsorday.jpg
809 ms
windsorhorseshow5.jpg
645 ms
shadow_r.jpg
569 ms
shadow_tr.jpg
642 ms
shadow_lbr.jpg
653 ms
reader-banner.gif
651 ms
search.gif
653 ms
newsletter-content.gif
722 ms
signupbutton.gif
726 ms
shadow_b.jpg
740 ms
shadow_bl.jpg
730 ms
shadow_bbr.jpg
739 ms
google_icon.gif
22 ms
ABTAlogo2013.jpg
12 ms
giftvoucher.jpg
9 ms
top-nav-hover.gif
14 ms
motown2.jpg
12 ms
concertbutton_2012_hover.gif
14 ms
newsletter-bottom.gif
175 ms
why-book.jpg
40 ms
pinterest_icon.gif
44 ms
sm_ccsafe_check1.gif
45 ms
payby2.png
46 ms
flyingscotsmanbanner.jpg
47 ms
theatrebutton_2012.gif
46 ms
phone_icon.gif
18 ms
twitter_icon.gif
17 ms
sagepay.png
18 ms
top-nav-button.gif
38 ms
painkiller.jpg
40 ms
theatrebutton_2012_hover.gif
256 ms
cruisebutton_2012.gif
38 ms
ATOLlogo.jpg
16 ms
theatre25years.jpg
36 ms
concertbutton_2012.gif
15 ms
cruisebutton_2012_hover.gif
173 ms
linkid.js
9 ms
collect
10 ms
collect
58 ms
collect
24 ms
_WidgetJPCB0
334 ms
_WidgetJPCB1.js
68 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
147216381456427589263a.js
8 ms
reader.travel accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
reader.travel best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
reader.travel SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reader.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reader.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reader.travel
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reader. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: