Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

618 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

186 ms

reader.travel screenshot

About Website

Visit reader.travel now to see the best up-to-date Reader content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reader.travel

BOOKING WITH US Just choose one of our great getaways from the collection on the left and then simply relax and enjoy your time away.              

Visit reader.travel

Key Findings

We analyzed Reader.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 618 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reader.travel performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.219

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

home.php

618 ms

reader.css

188 ms

left-col-top.gif

49 ms

left-col-searchbox.gif

38 ms

print-button.gif

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Reader.travel, 12% (8 requests) were made to Site1.repository.omegaholidays.net and 9% (6 requests) were made to Site2.repository.omegaholidays.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) relates to the external source Repository.omegaholidays.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 488.4 kB (24%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Reader.travel main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 77.2 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 137.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reader images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 267.2 kB

  • Original 364.0 kB
  • After minification 364.0 kB
  • After compression 96.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reader.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (27%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reader. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

reader.travel accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

reader.travel best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

reader.travel SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reader.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reader.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reader. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: