1.7 sec in total
144 ms
1.4 sec
211 ms
Visit readerlink.net now to see the best up-to-date Reader Link content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about readerlink.net
As one of the largest book distributors in America, ReaderLink works with publishers, authors, & retailers to reach readers across the globe.
Visit readerlink.netWe analyzed Readerlink.net page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
readerlink.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
144 ms
7 ms
62 ms
58 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (106 requests) were addressed to the original Readerlink.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (306 ms) belongs to the original domain Readerlink.net.
Page size can be reduced by 535.6 kB (38%)
1.4 MB
889.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Readerlink.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 699.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reader Link images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 452.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 452.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readerlink.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (61%)
61
24
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reader Link. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
readerlink.net
144 ms
ga.js
7 ms
base-20150506.css
62 ms
css3.css
58 ms
ie7.css
59 ms
jquery.tweet.css
65 ms
nivo-slider.css
65 ms
piecemaker.css
67 ms
prettyPhoto.css
114 ms
reset.css
84 ms
scroller.css
86 ms
short-code.css
116 ms
slider.css
90 ms
tipTip.css
88 ms
WebResource.axd
135 ms
ScriptResource.axd
138 ms
ScriptResource.axd
145 ms
jquery-1.8.1.min.js
195 ms
jquery-ui-1.7.2.min.js
238 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
135 ms
cufon-yui.js
149 ms
cufon-replace.js
147 ms
scripts.js
191 ms
custom.js
162 ms
shortcode.js
176 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
178 ms
linkedin.png
190 ms
facebook.png
203 ms
twitter.png
206 ms
rl_2.jpg
298 ms
rl_1.jpg
306 ms
rl_4.jpg
298 ms
rl_5.jpg
298 ms
rl_6.jpg
299 ms
lh-rl.jpg
299 ms
What_we_do_01.png
300 ms
What_we_do_02.png
299 ms
What_we_do_03.png
299 ms
Info_Subscribe.png
270 ms
ReaderLink_Logo_Footer.png
269 ms
ReaderLink_Logo.png
270 ms
light-bg.png
243 ms
top-full-width-bg.png
195 ms
top-abstract-bg.png
196 ms
sprite.png
197 ms
slider-full-width-bg.png
199 ms
slider-bg.png
201 ms
loading.gif
218 ms
seperator-980.png
222 ms
seperator-980-50-opa.png
223 ms
footer-full-width-bg.png
226 ms
drop-down-arr.png
60 ms
sprite.png
32 ms
sprite-shortcode.png
33 ms
bullet_red_alt.png
30 ms
exclamation.png
31 ms
information.png
29 ms
tick_circle.png
29 ms
cross_circle.png
30 ms
cross_grey_small.png
30 ms
button-light.png
31 ms
h300.png
31 ms
navigator_alt.png
31 ms
sprite.png
30 ms
sprite_x.png
30 ms
sprite_y.png
30 ms
sprite_next.png
30 ms
sprite_prev.png
30 ms
default_thumb.png
30 ms
loader.gif
29 ms
sprite.png
30 ms
btnNext.png
30 ms
btnPrevious.png
30 ms
sprite.png
32 ms
contentPattern.png
30 ms
btnNext.png
30 ms
btnPrevious.png
30 ms
loader.gif
31 ms
loader.gif
30 ms
sprite.png
30 ms
btnNext.png
29 ms
btnPrevious.png
29 ms
sprite.png
31 ms
btnNext.png
31 ms
btnPrevious.png
31 ms
sprite.png
32 ms
contentPatternTop.png
30 ms
contentPatternLeft.png
29 ms
contentPatternRight.png
30 ms
loader.gif
30 ms
btnNext.png
30 ms
btnPrevious.png
30 ms
contentPatternBottom.png
30 ms
default_thumbnail.gif
30 ms
loader.gif
29 ms
text-field-bg.png
30 ms
black-btn-bg.png
30 ms
preloader-light.gif
32 ms
preloader-dark.gif
31 ms
sprite-menu.png
29 ms
slide-overlay.png
29 ms
sp.png
29 ms
button-highlight.png
31 ms
video-light.jpg
31 ms
maginifier-light.jpg
29 ms
sp-fade.png
29 ms
404-shadow.png
29 ms
readerlink.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
readerlink.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
readerlink.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readerlink.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Readerlink.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readerlink.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reader Link. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: