6.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.1 sec
237 ms
Welcome to readerspark.com homepage info - get ready to check Readerspark best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about readerspark.com
Technology Blog
Visit readerspark.comWe analyzed Readerspark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
readerspark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value900 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value7.1 s
51/100
10%
1073 ms
562 ms
25 ms
38 ms
637 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Readerspark.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 17% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Img.iphonetopics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 304.2 kB (50%)
607.9 kB
303.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Readerspark.com main page is 607.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 248.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Readerspark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 153.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readerspark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (64%)
67
24
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readerspark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.readerspark.com
1073 ms
style.css
562 ms
css
25 ms
css
38 ms
base.css
637 ms
superfish.css
9 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
684 ms
font-awesome.css
6 ms
f1b5c602ff3b5ad65739cada8654ec4235a05353.css
490 ms
getads.js
25 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
x4eTjgY.jpg
29 ms
9979682205_a588184464_o.jpg
66 ms
9979846554_4292341d4e_o.png
129 ms
all.js
158 ms
bgside.png
37 ms
5DVGWnz9Skaq1amwwwGZEw.ttf
28 ms
-KZsao_xwBpcExaHoPH8_w.ttf
29 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
30 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
30 ms
getad
39 ms
likebox.php
239 ms
getad
32 ms
getad
32 ms
getad
38 ms
getad
27 ms
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
149 ms
xd_arbiter.php
331 ms
Amazon-deal-of-the-day.jpg
1112 ms
counter.js
5 ms
t.php
263 ms
jquery.js
80 ms
wp-embed.min.js
77 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
154 ms
roNeOY-tz5Y.css
213 ms
UHhaxo8Cs3k.css
287 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
391 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
418 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
326 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
328 ms
like.php
57 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
7 ms
like.php
55 ms
like.php
89 ms
like.php
97 ms
like.php
110 ms
like.php
122 ms
like.php
121 ms
like.php
92 ms
like.php
121 ms
like.php
128 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
391 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
240 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
47 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
49 ms
core.min.js
48 ms
modernizr.js
48 ms
superfish.js
59 ms
supersubs.js
59 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
60 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
58 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
88 ms
224190_371665226259461_543707706_n.png
179 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
51 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
51 ms
jot.html
29 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
42 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
76 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
27 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
collect
13 ms
readerspark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
readerspark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
readerspark.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readerspark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readerspark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readerspark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Readerspark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: