Tools & Wizards About Us
readingcleaners.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

readingcleaners.net

End of Tenancy cleaning in Reading

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

readingcleaners.net screenshot

About Website

Visit readingcleaners.net now to see the best up-to-date Reading Cleaners content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about readingcleaners.net

1st class professional cleaning take care of all your End of Tenancy Cleaning in Reading. Our team of experienced cleaners will leave your property looking spotless and ready for inspection. With our ...

Visit readingcleaners.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Readingcleaners.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readingcleaners.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

readingcleaners.net

1565 ms

frontend.min.css

217 ms

styles.css

310 ms

animate.min.css

604 ms

custom-animate.css

437 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Readingcleaners.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Readingcleaners.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (71%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

771.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Readingcleaners.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 391.4 kB

  • Original 417.1 kB
  • After minification 376.8 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 391.4 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 363.2 kB
  • After minification 363.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reading Cleaners images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 580.2 kB

  • Original 824.1 kB
  • After minification 811.2 kB
  • After compression 243.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 580.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 934.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 969.2 kB
  • After compression 138.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readingcleaners.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 934.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (82%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reading Cleaners. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

readingcleaners.net

readingcleaners.net

1565 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

217 ms

styles.css

styles.css

310 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

604 ms

custom-animate.css

custom-animate.css

437 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

326 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

327 ms

jarallax.css

jarallax.css

322 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.css

jquery.magnific-popup.css

435 ms

odometer.min.css

odometer.min.css

431 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

445 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

442 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

539 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

576 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.css

style.css

560 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

908 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

752 ms

style.css

style.css

1249 ms

public.css

public.css

671 ms

joinchat-btn.min.css

joinchat-btn.min.css

690 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

728 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1209 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

808 ms

global.css

global.css

860 ms

post-161.css

post-161.css

859 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

921 ms

css

css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

968 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1070 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1027 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1226 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1081 ms

js

js

66 ms

post-1558.css

post-1558.css

1036 ms

post-1565.css

post-1565.css

1077 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1087 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1412 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1414 ms

index.js

index.js

1307 ms

index.js

index.js

1214 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1204 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

1197 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

1197 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

1093 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

1089 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

1088 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

1083 ms

jquery.appear.min.js

jquery.appear.min.js

1081 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1037 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1032 ms

jquery.circle-progress.min.js

jquery.circle-progress.min.js

1016 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

1018 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1016 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1057 ms

wow.js

wow.js

967 ms

sharer.min.js

sharer.min.js

946 ms

brote-addon.js

brote-addon.js

929 ms

brote-theme.js

brote-theme.js

882 ms

joinchat.min.js

joinchat.min.js

878 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

902 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

875 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

890 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

887 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

820 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

776 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

815 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

766 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

752 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

769 ms

logo-blue.png

logo-blue.png

651 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

514 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

584 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

533 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

583 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

582 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

618 ms

brote-footer-bg.png

brote-footer-bg.png

611 ms

main-slider-two-shape-2.png

main-slider-two-shape-2.png

417 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-1.png

main-slider-two-bubble-1.png

418 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-2.png

main-slider-two-bubble-2.png

446 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-3.png

main-slider-two-bubble-3.png

447 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-4.png

main-slider-two-bubble-4.png

476 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-5.png

main-slider-two-bubble-5.png

508 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-6.png

main-slider-two-bubble-6.png

512 ms

main-slider-two-bubble-7.png

main-slider-two-bubble-7.png

520 ms

main-slider-2-1.jpg

main-slider-2-1.jpg

582 ms

main-slider-two-shape-1.png

main-slider-two-shape-1.png

561 ms

B2-scaled.jpeg

B2-scaled.jpeg

227 ms

SEO Factors

readingcleaners.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readingcleaners.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readingcleaners.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

readingcleaners.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reading Cleaners. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: