Tools & Wizards About Us
readingcosmetic.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

readingcosmetic.co.uk

Beauty Aesthetic Specialist Reading | Reding Cosmetics

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

159 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

readingcosmetic.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to readingcosmetic.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Reading Cosmetic best content right away, or after learning these important things about readingcosmetic.co.uk

Elevate your beauty at Reading Cosmetics. From laser procedures to revitalizing peels, our experts offer bespoke care for all your aesthetic needs. Call us!

Visit readingcosmetic.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Readingcosmetic.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 159 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readingcosmetic.co.uk performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,370 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.readingcosmetic.co.uk

159 ms

minified.js

47 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

77 ms

polyfill.min.js

79 ms

mms.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Readingcosmetic.co.uk, 20% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com and 18% (11 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 965.6 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

956.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Readingcosmetic.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 912.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 732.0 kB

  • Original 897.6 kB
  • After minification 895.6 kB
  • After compression 165.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 732.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 44.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reading Cosmetic needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 227.9 kB

  • Original 912.9 kB
  • After minification 912.9 kB
  • After compression 685.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 227.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readingcosmetic.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reading Cosmetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.readingcosmetic.co.uk

www.readingcosmetic.co.uk

159 ms

minified.js

minified.js

47 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

77 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

79 ms

mms.js

mms.js

46 ms

api.js

api.js

87 ms

js

js

171 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

73 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

74 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

51 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

60 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

51 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

52 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

59 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

60 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

60 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

157 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

102 ms

506247_9ebcd5a0ef194e0c826c66d5242232af~mv2_d_2550_3300_s_4_2.jpg

506247_9ebcd5a0ef194e0c826c66d5242232af~mv2_d_2550_3300_s_4_2.jpg

659 ms

Wtr8F8mB06I

Wtr8F8mB06I

236 ms

bWJ4Cd4RMc8

bWJ4Cd4RMc8

584 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

124 ms

506247_2cb562f3c8524714939f05f1dda2c772~mv2_d_3054_1954_s_2.png

506247_2cb562f3c8524714939f05f1dda2c772~mv2_d_3054_1954_s_2.png

843 ms

506247_24454515348b4adfa86e756df27dced1~mv2.png

506247_24454515348b4adfa86e756df27dced1~mv2.png

846 ms

506247_8c7aa5131f654c918080f102b2db1cd9~mv2.jpg

506247_8c7aa5131f654c918080f102b2db1cd9~mv2.jpg

960 ms

506247_7fe47b46cb264b828f8d6a14c5bfa46d~mv2_d_1744_1334_s_2.jpg

506247_7fe47b46cb264b828f8d6a14c5bfa46d~mv2_d_1744_1334_s_2.jpg

961 ms

506247_9a3ae5b25e8d4ab2a55a99749f3ed86d~mv2_d_1600_1674_s_2.jpg

506247_9a3ae5b25e8d4ab2a55a99749f3ed86d~mv2_d_1600_1674_s_2.jpg

961 ms

360_F_343523581_D8kFQpta7VTv5o2b9Oi0LOocygz1qqJt_edited.jpg

360_F_343523581_D8kFQpta7VTv5o2b9Oi0LOocygz1qqJt_edited.jpg

844 ms

twitter_edited.png

twitter_edited.png

1061 ms

506247_8ee136a172fa485abaf8e85a2fe4ba02~mv2.png

506247_8ee136a172fa485abaf8e85a2fe4ba02~mv2.png

1062 ms

whatsapp_edited.jpg

whatsapp_edited.jpg

961 ms

carequalitycommission.png

carequalitycommission.png

1060 ms

02a42e3bce4c85df63bdde1.js

02a42e3bce4c85df63bdde1.js

626 ms

157 ms

script.js

script.js

980 ms

342 ms

338 ms

339 ms

336 ms

333 ms

333 ms

453 ms

449 ms

450 ms

451 ms

449 ms

447 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

22 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

47 ms

base.js

base.js

42 ms

251 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

468 ms

Q_BtBDv5dYOJzhRCKxAP2e8Htmv8FmyjEtTc2-mDxbE.js

Q_BtBDv5dYOJzhRCKxAP2e8Htmv8FmyjEtTc2-mDxbE.js

203 ms

embed.js

embed.js

166 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

240 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

242 ms

id

id

30 ms

insights

insights

218 ms

Create

Create

29 ms

Create

Create

32 ms

Accessibility Review

readingcosmetic.co.uk accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

readingcosmetic.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

readingcosmetic.co.uk SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readingcosmetic.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readingcosmetic.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

readingcosmetic.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reading Cosmetic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: