Tools & Wizards About Us
readingplastic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

readingplastic.com

Precision Plastic Machining, Die Stamping, Custom Plastics & More

Page Load Speed

983 ms in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

617 ms

Page Rendered

334 ms

readingplastic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Reading Plastic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about readingplastic.com

Get the high-end machined plastic parts you need. Advanced plastics demand a hard-to-find combination of materials, equipment & expertise. Request a quote!

Visit readingplastic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Readingplastic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 951 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readingplastic.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

readingplastic.com

32 ms

readingplastic.com

28 ms

js

73 ms

style.min.css

9 ms

styles.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Readingplastic.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (251 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 443.9 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Readingplastic.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 53.7 kB

  • Original 71.2 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reading Plastic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 366.2 kB

  • Original 794.3 kB
  • After minification 794.3 kB
  • After compression 428.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 366.2 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 151.8 kB
  • After minification 148.9 kB
  • After compression 132.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readingplastic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (71%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reading Plastic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

readingplastic.com

readingplastic.com

32 ms

readingplastic.com

readingplastic.com

28 ms

js

js

73 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

9 ms

styles.css

styles.css

29 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

29 ms

topbar_style.css

topbar_style.css

47 ms

videobackgroundpro.css

videobackgroundpro.css

48 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

wpfront-scroll-top.min.css

45 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

46 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

47 ms

webflow.css

webflow.css

49 ms

reading-plastics.webflow.css

reading-plastics.webflow.css

51 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

all.css

all.css

60 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

81 ms

wp-paginate.css

wp-paginate.css

54 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

55 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

54 ms

tpbr_front.min.js

tpbr_front.min.js

52 ms

player.js

player.js

68 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

58 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

53 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

54 ms

js

js

102 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

54 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

56 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

56 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

55 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

53 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

56 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

57 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

61 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

63 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

62 ms

api.js

api.js

66 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

61 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

60 ms

index.js

index.js

61 ms

VideoBackgroundPro.js

VideoBackgroundPro.js

63 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

65 ms

webflow.js

webflow.js

66 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

66 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

64 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

99 ms

css

css

37 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

166 ms

wt.php

wt.php

183 ms

rmp-logo-greyish-blue-v2.png

rmp-logo-greyish-blue-v2.png

141 ms

251 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

168 ms

new-banner-background.jpeg

new-banner-background.jpeg

29 ms

telecom-banner-600x600.jpg

telecom-banner-600x600.jpg

45 ms

150930-N-UD469-037-copy-e1454177352790-600x581.jpg

150930-N-UD469-037-copy-e1454177352790-600x581.jpg

29 ms

AdobeStock_163231017-600x533.jpeg

AdobeStock_163231017-600x533.jpeg

45 ms

AdobeStock_268012088-600x533.jpeg

AdobeStock_268012088-600x533.jpeg

29 ms

RPF0457.png

RPF0457.png

55 ms

coils-backgnd.jpg

coils-backgnd.jpg

66 ms

email-icon.png

email-icon.png

54 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

54 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

54 ms

youtube-icon.png

youtube-icon.png

54 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

59 ms

112.png

112.png

58 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

151 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

152 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

153 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

40 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

56 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

3 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

webtraxs.php

webtraxs.php

141 ms

js

js

95 ms

anchor

anchor

38 ms

51 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

ir-ydOIl7T1o6_CJ5-TP2ENprJnWrhJr55f_5M34c1U.js

ir-ydOIl7T1o6_CJ5-TP2ENprJnWrhJr55f_5M34c1U.js

32 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

34 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

21 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

14 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

13 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

13 ms

Accessibility Review

readingplastic.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

readingplastic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

readingplastic.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readingplastic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Readingplastic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

readingplastic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reading Plastic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: