Tools & Wizards About Us
reaf-sf.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 44

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

reaf-sf.org

The Richmond/ermet Aid Foundation of San Francisco, Ca

Page Load Speed

840 ms in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

678 ms

Page Rendered

112 ms

reaf-sf.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Reaf Sf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reaf-sf.org

The Richmond/Ermet Aid Foundation of San Francisco produces fundraising events for HIV/AIDS, hunger and youth services.

Visit reaf-sf.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Reaf-sf.org page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 790 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reaf-sf.org performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.reaf-sf.org

50 ms

site.css

12 ms

duel.js

25 ms

keela-forms.min.css

23 ms

keela-forms.min.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Reaf-sf.org, 41% (13 requests) were made to P3pprd001.cloudstorage.secureserver.net and 19% (6 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source P3pprd001.cloudstorage.secureserver.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 398.6 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

708.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reaf-sf.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 538.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

  • Original 54.4 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 538.4 kB
  • After minification 536.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reaf Sf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 288.0 kB

  • Original 425.3 kB
  • After minification 425.0 kB
  • After compression 137.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 288.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 67.2 kB

  • Original 88.5 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reaf-sf.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (55%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reaf Sf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.reaf-sf.org

www.reaf-sf.org

50 ms

site.css

site.css

12 ms

duel.js

duel.js

25 ms

keela-forms.min.css

keela-forms.min.css

23 ms

keela-forms.min.js

keela-forms.min.js

46 ms

jq.js

jq.js

466 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

32 ms

f9df2093285a8d9a0da14860d81d576a

f9df2093285a8d9a0da14860d81d576a

118 ms

subNavigation.js

subNavigation.js

367 ms

media.audioplayer.js

media.audioplayer.js

364 ms

8420398

8420398

161 ms

cookiemanager.js

cookiemanager.js

363 ms

iebackground.js

iebackground.js

363 ms

wsb-audioplayer-controls-64.png

wsb-audioplayer-controls-64.png

362 ms

d4a8134852b8b61700ea2aa17a198876

d4a8134852b8b61700ea2aa17a198876

108 ms

2005377490caa8a3a70df1b98fbe7195

2005377490caa8a3a70df1b98fbe7195

116 ms

66edb4e9ffeb7dbd4f9c7bc82d1324d8

66edb4e9ffeb7dbd4f9c7bc82d1324d8

123 ms

5722fbdd15a0ea326c42a2a3fd539a8d

5722fbdd15a0ea326c42a2a3fd539a8d

117 ms

4250eeffdc6dc512ae93c0f6ec61b87e

4250eeffdc6dc512ae93c0f6ec61b87e

116 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

14 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

_Xmr-H4zszafZw3A-KPSZut9wQiX.woff

_Xmr-H4zszafZw3A-KPSZut9wQiX.woff

6 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

8 ms

util.instances.js

util.instances.js

55 ms

util.model.js

util.model.js

57 ms

documentHelper.js

documentHelper.js

56 ms

jquery.dotdotdot.js

jquery.dotdotdot.js

55 ms

jquery.jplayer.js

jquery.jplayer.js

159 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

108 ms

util.window.js

util.window.js

107 ms

sf.core.pkg.js

sf.core.pkg.js

35 ms

app.css

app.css

17 ms

Accessibility Review

reaf-sf.org accessibility score

44

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reaf-sf.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reaf-sf.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reaf-sf.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reaf-sf.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reaf-sf.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reaf Sf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: