4.7 sec in total
227 ms
2.6 sec
1.8 sec
Welcome to reaplicante.com homepage info - get ready to check Reaplicante best content for Spain right away, or after learning these important things about reaplicante.com
Blog de SEO, Marketing Online y WordPress explicado para humanos. Estoy seguro que no te va a dejar indiferente, ¿entras?
Visit reaplicante.comWe analyzed Reaplicante.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
reaplicante.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
227 ms
488 ms
31 ms
118 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reaplicante.com, 74% (60 requests) were made to Sergioramirez.org and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (790 ms) relates to the external source Sergioramirez.org.
Page size can be reduced by 124.3 kB (16%)
767.0 kB
642.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Reaplicante.com main page is 767.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 563.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reaplicante images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 489 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 88 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reaplicante.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88 B or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (75%)
72
18
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reaplicante. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reaplicante.com
227 ms
sergioramirez.org
488 ms
css
31 ms
style.min.css
118 ms
kk-star-ratings.min.css
203 ms
styles.css
233 ms
mailerlite_forms.css
254 ms
screen.min.css
257 ms
style.min.css
254 ms
theme.min.css
256 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
290 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
309 ms
frontend.min.css
430 ms
post-9996.css
339 ms
frontend.min.css
436 ms
global.css
339 ms
post-4722.css
375 ms
post-9604.css
385 ms
post-9619.css
422 ms
post-9770.css
423 ms
default.min.css
459 ms
fontawesome.min.css
479 ms
solid.min.css
506 ms
regular.min.css
506 ms
jquery.min.js
562 ms
adsbygoogle.js
90 ms
brands.min.css
517 ms
animations.min.css
544 ms
kk-star-ratings.min.js
554 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
687 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
688 ms
index.js
701 ms
front.min.js
700 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
700 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
699 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
699 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
699 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
790 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
782 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
788 ms
frontend.min.js
702 ms
waypoints.min.js
599 ms
core.min.js
579 ms
swiper.min.js
687 ms
share-link.min.js
635 ms
dialog.min.js
633 ms
frontend.min.js
660 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
654 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
624 ms
lazyload.min.js
640 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
458b29owiu
225 ms
universal.js
155 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
423 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
336 ms
font
86 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
487 ms
font
101 ms
font
208 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
13 ms
universal.css
32 ms
collect
68 ms
js
123 ms
js
268 ms
clarity.js
17 ms
ga-audiences
111 ms
ea92e5ebec0214ce0fa83600cd3cd8a1
18 ms
720x300_es.png
72 ms
cropped-sergio-ramirez-logo-or94q9fgn88tbxzo6w54gtq3uxhqain0yy62f6fm3o.png
210 ms
sergio-ramirez-portada-oib3xdloot8wh9whtt9yaz04o478k2eaacnqib8ub2.jpg
186 ms
mailerlite-email-marketing.jpg
110 ms
hosting-raiola-def.jpg
168 ms
linkedin-opciones-1200x800.jpg
386 ms
que-es-email-marketing.jpg
249 ms
rank-math-plugin-seo.jpg
328 ms
que-es-engagement-calculadora.jpg
288 ms
quitar-fondo-a-una-imagen-800x240.jpg
305 ms
plugins-recetas-cocina.jpg
325 ms
58 ms
www.mailerlite.com
123 ms
reaplicante.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
reaplicante.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
reaplicante.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reaplicante.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reaplicante.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reaplicante.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reaplicante. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: