Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

reapmatters.org

Robot Challenge Screen

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

596 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

436 ms

reapmatters.org screenshot

About Website

Visit reapmatters.org now to see the best up-to-date Reapmatters content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reapmatters.org

The impact of rural people and places in North Dakota is measurable and significant for the future of the state.

Visit reapmatters.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Reapmatters.org page load time and found that the first response time was 596 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reapmatters.org performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reapmatters.org

596 ms

style.css

35 ms

js

64 ms

jquery.min.js

83 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Reapmatters.org, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (596 ms) belongs to the original domain Reapmatters.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 256.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Reapmatters.org main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 151.7 kB

  • Original 179.3 kB
  • After minification 176.4 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 75.2 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reapmatters images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 464.2 kB
  • After minification 464.2 kB
  • After compression 439.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 79.3 kB
  • After minification 79.3 kB
  • After compression 74.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reapmatters.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (49%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reapmatters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

reapmatters.org accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reapmatters.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reapmatters.org SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reapmatters.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reapmatters.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reapmatters. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: