Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 65

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

reaproject.org

Regional Economic Analysis Project (REAP)

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

reaproject.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rea Project content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reaproject.org

Using the interactive regional economic tools of analysis at your disposal on this website, conduct your own research about changing local economic conditions and trends throughout the United States.

Visit reaproject.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Reaproject.org page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reaproject.org performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reaproject.org

214 ms

reaproject.org

311 ms

www.reaproject.org

185 ms

www.reaproject.org

372 ms

reap-homepage.min.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Reaproject.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (617 ms) belongs to the original domain Reaproject.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

628.5 kB

After Optimization

586.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Reaproject.org main page is 628.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 523.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 52.6 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 27 B

  • Original 523.8 kB
  • After minification 523.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rea Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 445 B

  • Original 41.2 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 40.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reaproject.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (13%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

66

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rea Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

reaproject.org accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

reaproject.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

reaproject.org SEO score

65

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reaproject.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reaproject.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rea Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: