1.4 sec in total
366 ms
741 ms
258 ms
Visit reasoning.biz now to see the best up-to-date Reason Ing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reasoning.biz
Visit reasoning.bizWe analyzed Reasoning.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 999 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
reasoning.biz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
91/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
366 ms
140 ms
202 ms
138 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Reasoning.biz, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Creativecommons.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (366 ms) belongs to the original domain Reasoning.biz.
Page size can be reduced by 11.8 kB (36%)
33.0 kB
21.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Reasoning.biz main page is 33.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reason Ing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 849 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reasoning.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 849 B or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (83%)
35
6
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reason Ing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
reasoning.biz
366 ms
reason.css
140 ms
reason.jpg
202 ms
spacer.gif
138 ms
tab_grey_lhs.jpg
178 ms
tab_grey_rhs.jpg
178 ms
button_green_lhs.jpg
193 ms
button_green_rhs.jpg
208 ms
button_blue_lhs.jpg
150 ms
button_blue_rhs.jpg
158 ms
menu_top_lhs.gif
159 ms
menu_top_mid.gif
204 ms
menu_top_rhs.gif
213 ms
menu_top_fade_lhs.gif
221 ms
menu_top_fade_rhs.gif
222 ms
cc-GPL-a.png
22 ms
patch_top_lhs.gif
223 ms
patch_top_mid.gif
232 ms
patch_top_rhs.gif
273 ms
patch_lhs.gif
289 ms
patch_rhs.gif
291 ms
patch_bottom_lhs.gif
289 ms
patch_bottom_mid.gif
296 ms
patch_bottom_rhs.gif
298 ms
hack_day_pattern_six.gif
44 ms
urchin.js
12 ms
menu_bottom_fade_lhs.gif
281 ms
menu_bottom_fade_rhs.gif
299 ms
menu_bottom_lhs.gif
298 ms
menu_bottom_mid.gif
300 ms
menu_bottom_rhs.gif
306 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
tab_grey_mid.jpg
278 ms
button_green_mid.jpg
316 ms
button_blue_mid.jpg
339 ms
patch_mid.gif
339 ms
reasoning.biz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
reasoning.biz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
reasoning.biz SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reasoning.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reasoning.biz main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
reasoning.biz
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reason Ing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: