Tools & Wizards About Us
rebarweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

rebarweb.com

The first rebar detailing software in cloud | Rebar Web

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

260 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

132 ms

rebarweb.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rebarweb.com homepage info - get ready to check Rebar Web best content right away, or after learning these important things about rebarweb.com

Bar Bending Scheduling.Create, send and receive bar lists in a standardized format. Export them directly to your management system.

Visit rebarweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rebarweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rebarweb.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.074

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rebarweb.com

260 ms

www.rebarweb.com

582 ms

boilerplate.css

83 ms

stylos-publico.css

170 ms

jquery.jgrowl.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Rebarweb.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Ssif1.globalsign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rebarweb.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 778.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 30.7 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 59.3 kB

  • Original 778.7 kB
  • After minification 719.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rebar Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 349.5 kB
  • After minification 349.3 kB
  • After compression 336.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebarweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (61%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rebar Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rebarweb.com

rebarweb.com

260 ms

www.rebarweb.com

www.rebarweb.com

582 ms

boilerplate.css

boilerplate.css

83 ms

stylos-publico.css

stylos-publico.css

170 ms

jquery.jgrowl.css

jquery.jgrowl.css

242 ms

css

css

40 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

62 ms

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

345 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

242 ms

style1.css

style1.css

243 ms

modernizr.custom.86080.js

modernizr.custom.86080.js

262 ms

jquery.jgrowl.js

jquery.jgrowl.js

268 ms

component.css

component.css

320 ms

stylos-medias.css

stylos-medias.css

328 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

gs_noscript_110-45_en.gif

gs_noscript_110-45_en.gif

42 ms

gmogs_image_110-45_en_dblue.js

gmogs_image_110-45_en_dblue.js

58 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

323 ms

classie.js

classie.js

328 ms

modalEffects.js

modalEffects.js

352 ms

cssParser.js

cssParser.js

494 ms

css-filters-polyfill.js

css-filters-polyfill.js

415 ms

ico-organiza.png

ico-organiza.png

415 ms

ico-crea.png

ico-crea.png

415 ms

ico-imprime.png

ico-imprime.png

459 ms

ico-comparte.png

ico-comparte.png

461 ms

logotipo-ing.png

logotipo-ing.png

516 ms

loading.png

loading.png

515 ms

foto-descubre-mas.png

foto-descubre-mas.png

786 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

544 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

545 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

577 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

589 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

588 ms

icono-email1.png

icono-email1.png

628 ms

icono-contrasena1.png

icono-contrasena1.png

625 ms

fondo.gif

fondo.gif

421 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

38 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

57 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

43 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

290 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

963 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

661 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

676 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

704 ms

www.rebarweb.com

www.rebarweb.com

564 ms

slider-desarrollo.html

slider-desarrollo.html

505 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

34 ms

gs_noscript_110-45_en.gif

gs_noscript_110-45_en.gif

28 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

607 ms

siteSeal.do

siteSeal.do

3747 ms

fondo-acceso.gif

fondo-acceso.gif

698 ms

cerrar.png

cerrar.png

698 ms

collect

collect

48 ms

js

js

63 ms

boilerplate.css

boilerplate.css

622 ms

stylos-publico.css

stylos-publico.css

644 ms

jquery.jgrowl.css

jquery.jgrowl.css

657 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

33 ms

style1.css

style1.css

666 ms

component.css

component.css

667 ms

stylos-medias.css

stylos-medias.css

711 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

57 ms

fallback

fallback

44 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

3 ms

css

css

18 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

3 ms

slider-css.css

slider-css.css

455 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

456 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

84 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

141 ms

dot-visor.gif

dot-visor.gif

97 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

88 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

131 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

107 ms

dot.gif

dot.gif

81 ms

triangle.png

triangle.png

81 ms

Accessibility Review

rebarweb.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rebarweb.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rebarweb.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebarweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rebarweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rebarweb.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rebar Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: