7.2 sec in total
264 ms
6.2 sec
786 ms
Welcome to rebuildconsortium.com homepage info - get ready to check ReBUILD Consortium best content right away, or after learning these important things about rebuildconsortium.com
ReBUILD for Resilience examines health system resilience in fragile settings experiencing violence, conflict, pandemics and other shocks
Visit rebuildconsortium.comWe analyzed Rebuildconsortium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rebuildconsortium.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.587
11/100
15%
Value23.0 s
1/100
10%
264 ms
1659 ms
107 ms
87 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Rebuildconsortium.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rebuildconsortium.com.
Page size can be reduced by 139.9 kB (3%)
4.1 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rebuildconsortium.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ReBUILD Consortium images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebuildconsortium.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (74%)
86
22
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ReBUILD Consortium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rebuildconsortium.com
264 ms
www.rebuildconsortium.com
1659 ms
kyk7iov.css
107 ms
style.min.css
87 ms
classic-themes.min.css
172 ms
search-filter.min.css
273 ms
style.css
261 ms
bootstrap.min.css
47 ms
all.css
58 ms
layout.css
259 ms
script.min.js
264 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
43 ms
search-filter-build.min.js
367 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
256 ms
slick.css
53 ms
formreset.min.css
345 ms
formsmain.min.css
354 ms
readyclass.min.css
351 ms
browsers.min.css
353 ms
core.min.js
355 ms
datepicker.min.js
442 ms
5afe5afed4.js
168 ms
v4-shims.js
173 ms
popper.min.js
49 ms
bootstrap.min.js
104 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
464 ms
sitejs-min.js
474 ms
slick.min.js
67 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
473 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
473 ms
page-builder-min.js
473 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
546 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
548 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
569 ms
dom-ready.min.js
573 ms
hooks.min.js
573 ms
i18n.min.js
574 ms
a11y.min.js
822 ms
jquery.json.min.js
824 ms
gravityforms.min.js
824 ms
api.js
66 ms
utils.min.js
823 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
824 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
824 ms
p.css
27 ms
gtm.js
81 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
687 ms
HsdHottmbAk
172 ms
%3E
1045 ms
Rebuild-Logo.jpg
504 ms
E68_CCS_Graphic-e1724758977855.jpg
738 ms
OPM-webinar-Instagram-Post.jpg
776 ms
OPM-webinar-Twitter-Post-1.jpg
799 ms
OPM-webinar-Instagram-Post-1.png
739 ms
OPM-webinar-Instagram-Post.jpg
768 ms
Najla-lecture-recording-1.jpg
859 ms
51738063619_46858b67e2_k-e1643127752251.jpg
859 ms
IMG_0212-scaled-e1699962368412.jpg
1041 ms
R4R-30-Nav-Projects-1.jpg
1042 ms
R4R-30-Hone-About-1.jpg
890 ms
R4R-70-Home-Building.jpg
1041 ms
R4R-Homepage-Slider-M-Research.jpg
943 ms
R4R-Homepage-Slider-Events.jpg
979 ms
R4R-Homepage-Slider-Resources-1.jpg
1041 ms
UKaid.svg_.png
1013 ms
d
38 ms
d
44 ms
d
62 ms
d
53 ms
d
43 ms
d
164 ms
d
44 ms
d
52 ms
d
53 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
43 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
37 ms
5afe5afed4.css
32 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
15 ms
www-player.css
5 ms
www-embed-player.js
29 ms
base.js
56 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
48 ms
ad_status.js
191 ms
UCY5Klx_0fJhMytIltuKLUwnjJON9GWedkq6jjIrpW0.js
99 ms
embed.js
60 ms
recaptcha__en.js
162 ms
id
100 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
148 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
148 ms
Create
63 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
layout.css
92 ms
script.min.js
94 ms
5afe5afed4.js
112 ms
v4-shims.js
128 ms
popper.min.js
12 ms
bootstrap.min.js
129 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
89 ms
sitejs-min.js
92 ms
hooks.min.js
109 ms
i18n.min.js
127 ms
a11y.min.js
172 ms
gravityforms.min.js
176 ms
rebuildconsortium.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
rebuildconsortium.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rebuildconsortium.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebuildconsortium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rebuildconsortium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rebuildconsortium.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ReBUILD Consortium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: