Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

rebuildconsortium.com

Introducing ReBUILD for Resilience - health systems researchRebuild Consortium

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

264 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

786 ms

rebuildconsortium.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rebuildconsortium.com homepage info - get ready to check ReBUILD Consortium best content right away, or after learning these important things about rebuildconsortium.com

ReBUILD for Resilience examines health system resilience in fragile settings experiencing violence, conflict, pandemics and other shocks

Visit rebuildconsortium.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rebuildconsortium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rebuildconsortium.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.587

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rebuildconsortium.com

264 ms

www.rebuildconsortium.com

1659 ms

kyk7iov.css

107 ms

style.min.css

87 ms

classic-themes.min.css

172 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Rebuildconsortium.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rebuildconsortium.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Rebuildconsortium.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 114.1 kB

  • Original 137.4 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 18.0 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ReBUILD Consortium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 517.3 kB
  • After minification 517.2 kB
  • After compression 512.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 125.6 kB
  • After minification 125.4 kB
  • After compression 122.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebuildconsortium.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (74%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ReBUILD Consortium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rebuildconsortium.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rebuildconsortium.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rebuildconsortium.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebuildconsortium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rebuildconsortium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ReBUILD Consortium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: