4.8 sec in total
168 ms
4.1 sec
490 ms
Welcome to rebuildwp.com homepage info - get ready to check Rebuild WP best content right away, or after learning these important things about rebuildwp.com
24/7 Premium WordPress support from top tier developers for $79/month. We provide comprehensive WordPress maintenance, assistance and security services.
Visit rebuildwp.comWe analyzed Rebuildwp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rebuildwp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.8 s
82/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
168 ms
1445 ms
277 ms
284 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Rebuildwp.com, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rebuildwp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 212.5 kB (22%)
987.8 kB
775.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rebuildwp.com main page is 987.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 458.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rebuild WP needs image optimization as it can save up to 136.3 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebuildwp.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (62%)
60
23
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rebuild WP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rebuildwp.com
168 ms
rebuildwp.com
1445 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
277 ms
style.min.css
284 ms
classic-themes.min.css
222 ms
forms.min.css
234 ms
frontend-render.css
318 ms
font-awesome.min.css
335 ms
app.css
605 ms
style.css
477 ms
css
29 ms
js_composer.min.css
640 ms
optimizer.local.min.js
498 ms
jquery.min.js
600 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
541 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
690 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
730 ms
tracking.min.js
755 ms
gzo5rrg.js
89 ms
cta-variation.js
848 ms
inboundAnalytics.min.js
881 ms
js
57 ms
js
97 ms
email-decode.min.js
648 ms
css
16 ms
css
24 ms
css
24 ms
spin.min.js
797 ms
stickThis.js
922 ms
vendor.min.js
1283 ms
underscore.min.js
1104 ms
app.min.js
1130 ms
frontend.min.js
1107 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1109 ms
forms.js
1108 ms
9tc9kfnnvr5z.js
262 ms
badgeLight.png
241 ms
New-Project-19.png
416 ms
g1-e1527647860799.png
797 ms
b2-e1527647972131.png
797 ms
h3-e1527647816318.png
798 ms
g22-e1527648076813.png
797 ms
wpcert-e1527648025474.png
880 ms
30ddd-e1527647933127.png
920 ms
Superside_-frict.png
1162 ms
Pricing-front.png
1115 ms
wppricingfront-1.png
1117 ms
wordpress_support_fractal.png
1161 ms
c9.png
1118 ms
Wayne-Mayers-%E2%84%A2-waynemayers-%E2%80%A2-Instagram-photos-and-videos-140x140.png
1205 ms
download-4-140x140.jpg
1276 ms
Office-Black.jpg
1500 ms
166 ms
js
149 ms
analytics.js
609 ms
badgeLight.png
787 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
637 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
687 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
722 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
721 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
721 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
721 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
721 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
782 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
824 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff
824 ms
profitwell.js
744 ms
4714760.js
744 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1251 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1177 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9a6VQ.woff
708 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9a6VQ.woff
707 ms
651 ms
d
136 ms
d
241 ms
d
240 ms
d
304 ms
collect
97 ms
collect
154 ms
badgeLight.png
98 ms
ga-audiences
74 ms
p.gif
21 ms
rebuildwp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rebuildwp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rebuildwp.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebuildwp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rebuildwp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rebuildwp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rebuild WP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: