Tools & Wizards About Us
receivr.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

receivr.io

Receivr | Pricing - Live Telephone Answering | 40 calls answered for £29.99/m

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

762 ms

receivr.io screenshot

About Website

Visit receivr.io now to see the best up-to-date Receivr content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about receivr.io

Receivr Pricing: 40 calls answered for £29.99/month. Compare our prices with competitors. Receivr is the best priced telephone answering service.

Visit receivr.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Receivr.io page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

receivr.io performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

receivr.io

2536 ms

receivr.io

169 ms

html5shiv.js

2024 ms

respond.min.js

2024 ms

receivr-website.css

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Receivr.io, 26% (9 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Oss.maxcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Receivr.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Receivr.io main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 14.2 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Receivr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 170 B

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 34.7 kB
  • After compression 34.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 248.1 kB

  • Original 298.0 kB
  • After minification 231.4 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Receivr.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 248.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (24%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Receivr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

receivr.io

receivr.io

2536 ms

receivr.io

receivr.io

169 ms

html5shiv.js

html5shiv.js

2024 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

2024 ms

receivr-website.css

receivr-website.css

228 ms

vendors.css

vendors.css

937 ms

style.css

style.css

114 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

49 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

33 ms

slider.js

slider.js

143 ms

js

js

80 ms

logo.png

logo.png

167 ms

logo_01.png

logo_01.png

198 ms

logo_02.png

logo_02.png

729 ms

logo_03.png

logo_03.png

244 ms

OpenSans-Regular.woff

OpenSans-Regular.woff

441 ms

OpenSans-Semibold.woff

OpenSans-Semibold.woff

423 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

82 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

108 ms

bg-header.png

bg-header.png

180 ms

img_block_01.jpg

img_block_01.jpg

196 ms

bg-testimonials.png

bg-testimonials.png

186 ms

img_block_02.jpg

img_block_02.jpg

223 ms

star.png

star.png

299 ms

img_block_03.jpg

img_block_03.jpg

312 ms

arrow-left.png

arrow-left.png

307 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

350 ms

slide_01.jpg

slide_01.jpg

241 ms

slide_02.jpg

slide_02.jpg

643 ms

slide_03.jpg

slide_03.jpg

839 ms

OpenSans-Light.woff

OpenSans-Light.woff

468 ms

OpenSans-Bold.woff

OpenSans-Bold.woff

584 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

355 ms

Accessibility Review

receivr.io accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

receivr.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

receivr.io SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Receivr.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Receivr.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

receivr.io

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Receivr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: