Tools & Wizards About Us
recimg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

recimg.com

Update Drivers for Windows 10, 8, 7, Vista & XP with DriverUpdate | Slimware Utilities

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

423 ms

Page Rendered

909 ms

recimg.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to recimg.com homepage info - get ready to check Recimg best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about recimg.com

Find and update outdated drivers on your devices to make them perform better and faster. Run a free scan for Windows® 10, 8, 7, Vista & XP Operating Systems.

Visit recimg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Recimg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recimg.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,130 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

recimg.com

52 ms

flexslider.css

14 ms

sequence.css

15 ms

fancybox.css

16 ms

style.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Recimg.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (150 ms) belongs to the original domain Recimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Recimg.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 38.1 kB
  • After minification 36.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 77.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recimg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

  • Original 183.3 kB
  • After minification 183.0 kB
  • After compression 121.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 49.4 kB

  • Original 54.2 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recimg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (35%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recimg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

recimg.com

recimg.com

52 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

14 ms

sequence.css

sequence.css

15 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

16 ms

style.css

style.css

20 ms

.css

.css

16 ms

responsitive.css

responsitive.css

17 ms

css

css

65 ms

css

css

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

84 ms

js

js

47 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

17 ms

sequence.jquery-min.js

sequence.jquery-min.js

46 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

16 ms

quicksand.js

quicksand.js

16 ms

jquery.masonery.js

jquery.masonery.js

39 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

45 ms

gmaps.js

gmaps.js

45 ms

jquery.accordion.js

jquery.accordion.js

44 ms

fancybox.js

fancybox.js

43 ms

custom.js

custom.js

45 ms

logo_recimgmanager.png

logo_recimgmanager.png

150 ms

bg_blue.png

bg_blue.png

22 ms

pic_windows_pc.png

pic_windows_pc.png

25 ms

box_slimimage_n_med.png

box_slimimage_n_med.png

14 ms

box_recimg_n_med.png

box_recimg_n_med.png

15 ms

pic_arrow.png

pic_arrow.png

12 ms

power.png

power.png

14 ms

icon_cup.png

icon_cup.png

19 ms

icon_tick.png

icon_tick.png

22 ms

icon_slider.png

icon_slider.png

21 ms

icon_recimg.png

icon_recimg.png

23 ms

showcase.png

showcase.png

42 ms

check.png

check.png

40 ms

preview.png

preview.png

42 ms

recimg_windows8_backup_recover.jpg

recimg_windows8_backup_recover.jpg

42 ms

recimg_windows8_backup_recover1.jpg

recimg_windows8_backup_recover1.jpg

45 ms

recimg_windows8_backup_recover2.jpg

recimg_windows8_backup_recover2.jpg

46 ms

recimg_windows8_backup_recover5.jpg

recimg_windows8_backup_recover5.jpg

42 ms

recimg_windows8_backup_recover3.jpg

recimg_windows8_backup_recover3.jpg

65 ms

recimg_windows8_backup_recover4.jpg

recimg_windows8_backup_recover4.jpg

63 ms

cog.png

cog.png

62 ms

splash_middle.png

splash_middle.png

69 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

62 ms

pic_backup.png

pic_backup.png

64 ms

pic_restore.png

pic_restore.png

64 ms

pic_options.png

pic_options.png

63 ms

pic_os_protection.png

pic_os_protection.png

65 ms

note.png

note.png

65 ms

download_button_recimg.png

download_button_recimg.png

64 ms

download1.jpg

download1.jpg

65 ms

download2.jpg

download2.jpg

68 ms

download3.jpg

download3.jpg

66 ms

RjgO7rYTmqiVp7vzi-Q5USZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RjgO7rYTmqiVp7vzi-Q5USZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

14 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXdckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXdckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

35 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHdckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHdckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

38 ms

DINCompPro-CondBold_new.ttf

DINCompPro-CondBold_new.ttf

65 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

41 ms

Accessibility Review

recimg.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

recimg.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

recimg.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recimg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Recimg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

recimg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Recimg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: