Tools & Wizards About Us
recoil.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

recoil.in

Recoil Kit, Recoil Inserts, Recoil Insert, Recoil Tap

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

151 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

recoil.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Recoil content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about recoil.in

Recoil Kit, Recoil thread repair kits, a range of thread repair kits, wire thread inserts and more for repairing damaged threads.

Visit recoil.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Recoil.in page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recoil.in performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

recoil.in

151 ms

recoil.in

316 ms

js

85 ms

jquery.min.js

372 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

595 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Recoil.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) belongs to the original domain Recoil.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 636.2 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

751.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Recoil.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 539.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 614 B

  • Original 539.2 kB
  • After minification 538.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recoil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 354.3 kB

  • Original 521.8 kB
  • After minification 505.5 kB
  • After compression 167.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 354.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 256.3 kB

  • Original 295.1 kB
  • After minification 237.1 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recoil.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 256.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (32%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recoil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

recoil.in

recoil.in

151 ms

recoil.in

recoil.in

316 ms

js

js

85 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

372 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

595 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

333 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

448 ms

jquery.slimmenu.min.js

jquery.slimmenu.min.js

332 ms

jquery.socialshareprivacy.js

jquery.socialshareprivacy.js

332 ms

bootstrap-dropdown.js

bootstrap-dropdown.js

391 ms

bootstrap-tab.js

bootstrap-tab.js

374 ms

bootstrap-collapse.js

bootstrap-collapse.js

374 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

bootstrap-transition.js

417 ms

helper.js

helper.js

432 ms

searchHelper.js

searchHelper.js

427 ms

dark-bottom.css

dark-bottom.css

431 ms

css.css

css.css

848 ms

css(1).css

css(1).css

557 ms

freeCap.js

freeCap.js

486 ms

crawler.js

crawler.js

488 ms

swc.css

swc.css

485 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

12 ms

swc.js

swc.js

512 ms

bg.png

bg.png

120 ms

logoR.png

logoR.png

120 ms

mainmenu-item-right.png

mainmenu-item-right.png

61 ms

recoil-kit.jpg

recoil-kit.jpg

120 ms

Recoil-Free-Running-Insert.jpg

Recoil-Free-Running-Insert.jpg

122 ms

Recoil-Screw-Locking-Insert.jpg

Recoil-Screw-Locking-Insert.jpg

122 ms

recoil-taps.jpg

recoil-taps.jpg

143 ms

Recoil-Prewinder.jpg

Recoil-Prewinder.jpg

201 ms

Recoil-auto-spring.jpg

Recoil-auto-spring.jpg

159 ms

Recoil-Extraction-Tool.jpg

Recoil-Extraction-Tool.jpg

158 ms

Recoil-Electrical-Tool.jpg

Recoil-Electrical-Tool.jpg

160 ms

RecoilPneumaticPowerTool.jpg

RecoilPneumaticPowerTool.jpg

163 ms

RecoilThreadPlugGauge.jpg

RecoilThreadPlugGauge.jpg

199 ms

strip-feed.jpg

strip-feed.jpg

211 ms

Recoil-Tangless--Inserts.jpg

Recoil-Tangless--Inserts.jpg

211 ms

Recoil-Tangless-Tools.jpg

Recoil-Tangless-Tools.jpg

213 ms

recoil-kit-H.jpg

recoil-kit-H.jpg

216 ms

Free-Running-Insert-H.jpg

Free-Running-Insert-H.jpg

255 ms

Recoil-Screw-Locking-Insert-H.jpg

Recoil-Screw-Locking-Insert-H.jpg

253 ms

Recoil-taps-H.jpg

Recoil-taps-H.jpg

264 ms

Recoil-Thread-Plug-Gauge-H.jpg

Recoil-Thread-Plug-Gauge-H.jpg

266 ms

inserting-tools.jpg

inserting-tools.jpg

267 ms

Recoil-Auto-Spring-H.jpg

Recoil-Auto-Spring-H.jpg

270 ms

Extracting-Tools.jpg

Extracting-Tools.jpg

308 ms

Pneumatic-Power-Tool-H.jpg

Pneumatic-Power-Tool-H.jpg

306 ms

Recoil-Electrical-Tool-H.jpg

Recoil-Electrical-Tool-H.jpg

315 ms

strip-feed.jpg

strip-feed.jpg

325 ms

Recoil-Tangless-Tools-H.jpg

Recoil-Tangless-Tools-H.jpg

323 ms

logo-trans.png

logo-trans.png

325 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

361 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

360 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

368 ms

04.jpg

04.jpg

375 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

376 ms

06.jpg

06.jpg

381 ms

07.jpg

07.jpg

367 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

417 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

310 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

316 ms

google.png

google.png

337 ms

slideshow-shadow.png

slideshow-shadow.png

320 ms

misc-menu.png

misc-menu.png

371 ms

css(2).css

css(2).css

56 ms

Accessibility Review

recoil.in accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

recoil.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

recoil.in SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recoil.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Recoil.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

recoil.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Recoil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: