6.8 sec in total
427 ms
5.5 sec
885 ms
Click here to check amazing Recon Force content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reconforce.in
Recon Cyber security services
Visit reconforce.inWe analyzed Reconforce.in page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
reconforce.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
39/100
10%
427 ms
843 ms
205 ms
411 ms
567 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Reconforce.in, 11% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Reconforce.in.
Page size can be reduced by 180.7 kB (13%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Reconforce.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 907.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recon Force images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reconforce.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (48%)
103
54
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recon Force. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reconforce.in
427 ms
reconforce.in
843 ms
bootstrap.min.css
205 ms
fontawesome-all.css
411 ms
animate.css
567 ms
video.min.css
579 ms
slick.css
602 ms
slick-theme.css
612 ms
reset.css
612 ms
style.css
838 ms
logo.png
753 ms
pin.png
769 ms
mail.png
801 ms
call.png
813 ms
logo-1.svg
811 ms
b8.png
958 ms
b9.png
963 ms
bn1.png
1607 ms
b-cir1.png
1198 ms
b-cir2.png
1405 ms
jquery.min.js
1047 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1189 ms
popper.min.js
1195 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1253 ms
appear.js
1404 ms
slick.js
1414 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1417 ms
waypoints.min.js
1461 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1611 ms
jquery.filterizr.js
1594 ms
wow.min.js
1607 ms
gmap3.min.js
1617 ms
js
59 ms
script.js
1668 ms
css2
29 ms
css2
45 ms
btn-sh1.png
880 ms
btn-sh2.png
905 ms
select-arrow.png
899 ms
btn-sh3.png
914 ms
btn-sh4.png
917 ms
side-sh1.png
975 ms
sq-sh2.png
1075 ms
dot-sh1.png
1091 ms
dot-sh2.png
1106 ms
ab1.webp
1116 ms
ab2.webp
1118 ms
sq-sh1.png
1181 ms
ab3.jpg
1261 ms
ser-1.webp
1284 ms
ic1.png
1304 ms
ser-3.webp
1320 ms
ic2.png
1319 ms
ser-2.webp
1389 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
23 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
41 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff
49 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff
69 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
50 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
69 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
1591 ms
1h2a9lhhb
177 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
1816 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
1564 ms
fa-light-300.ttf
1651 ms
ic3.png
1231 ms
ser-4.webp
1308 ms
wc-bg.jpg
1378 ms
side-sh2.png
1310 ms
ic4.png
1330 ms
ic5.png
1407 ms
ic6.png
1416 ms
ic7.png
1457 ms
sq-sh3.png
1329 ms
wc.webp
1381 ms
faq-bg.jpg
1418 ms
side-sh3.png
1626 ms
fq2.webp
1422 ms
line-sh2.png
1356 ms
ic8.png
1329 ms
ic9.png
1378 ms
ic10.png
1420 ms
tst1.png
1427 ms
tst-cir.png
1667 ms
ic11.png
1456 ms
tst1.jpg
1395 ms
blog-1.jpg
1435 ms
blog-2.jpg
1433 ms
blog-3.jpg
1426 ms
img_01.png
1520 ms
img_02.png
1480 ms
img_03.png
1465 ms
img_04.png
1459 ms
img_05.png
1439 ms
img_06.png
1453 ms
logo-1.png
1524 ms
ic12.png
1465 ms
ic13.png
1406 ms
ic14.png
1344 ms
service-bg.jpg
1293 ms
fun-bg.jpg
1231 ms
hw-bg.jpg
1308 ms
tst-bg.jpg
1239 ms
ft-bg.jpg
1298 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
60 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
72 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
144 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
157 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
158 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
154 ms
twk-main.js
70 ms
twk-vendor.js
90 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
82 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
95 ms
twk-runtime.js
101 ms
twk-app.js
131 ms
reconforce.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
reconforce.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
reconforce.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reconforce.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reconforce.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reconforce.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Recon Force. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: