2.5 sec in total
140 ms
2 sec
421 ms
Welcome to recyclingexp.com homepage info - get ready to check Recycling Exp best content right away, or after learning these important things about recyclingexp.com
Low-Cost Recycling, Clean-Out & Shredding Services for Businesses and Households - Moving, Down-Sizing or Organizing ? Call Today for a Free Consultation !
Visit recyclingexp.comWe analyzed Recyclingexp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
recyclingexp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
140 ms
156 ms
17 ms
29 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Recyclingexp.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (912 ms) belongs to the original domain Recyclingexp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 313.4 kB (16%)
2.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Recyclingexp.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 162.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Recycling Exp needs image optimization as it can save up to 162.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recyclingexp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (83%)
96
16
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recycling Exp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
recyclingexp.com
140 ms
recyclingexp.com
156 ms
css
17 ms
css
29 ms
style.min.css
80 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
312 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
187 ms
styles.css
186 ms
symple_shortcodes_styles.css
396 ms
tc_shortCodes.css
188 ms
flexslider.css
199 ms
style.css
289 ms
morris.css
288 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
370 ms
normalize.min.css
389 ms
style.css
417 ms
jquery.sidr.light.css
385 ms
isotope.css
365 ms
flexslider.css
398 ms
font-awesome.css
408 ms
jquery.countdown.css
483 ms
owl.carousel.css
482 ms
owl.theme.css
600 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
597 ms
responsive.css
602 ms
boxed.css
485 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
541 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
595 ms
default.min.css
599 ms
jetpack.css
669 ms
jquery.min.js
912 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
712 ms
photon.min.js
775 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
850 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
870 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
706 ms
index.js
732 ms
canon_pagebuilder_front.js
736 ms
scripts.js
764 ms
e-202409.js
20 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
764 ms
scripts.js
738 ms
cleantabs.jquery.js
659 ms
jquery.animateNumbers.js
660 ms
raphael-2.1.0.min.js
697 ms
morris.js
679 ms
fittext.js
591 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
611 ms
core.min.js
716 ms
menu.min.js
660 ms
dom-ready.min.js
655 ms
hooks.min.js
640 ms
i18n.min.js
638 ms
a11y.min.js
630 ms
autocomplete.min.js
682 ms
jquery.isotope.js
669 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
647 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
545 ms
placeholder.js
592 ms
mosaic.1.0.1.min.js
594 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
536 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
526 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
547 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
521 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
523 ms
jquery.sidr.js
544 ms
cleantabs.jquery.js
445 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
436 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
432 ms
selectivizr-min.js
408 ms
jquery.countdown.js
406 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
400 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
402 ms
scrollReveal.js
393 ms
global_functions.js
381 ms
custom-scripts.js
361 ms
scripts.js
427 ms
comment-reply.min.js
402 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
408 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
391 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
397 ms
vimeo.min.js
470 ms
recycle-white-logo.png
139 ms
progress.gif
404 ms
hover-magnify.png
331 ms
clean-outs.jpg
454 ms
computers.jpg
533 ms
scrap.jpg
489 ms
paper-shredding.jpg
487 ms
print1.jpg
654 ms
reg-recycling.jpg
446 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
42 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
533 ms
all.js
54 ms
map.png
549 ms
trucking.jpg
562 ms
all.js
30 ms
26 ms
bigplay.svg
172 ms
controls.svg
187 ms
recyclingexp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
recyclingexp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
recyclingexp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recyclingexp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Recyclingexp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
recyclingexp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Recycling Exp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: