Tools & Wizards About Us
recyclingthepast.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

recyclingthepast.com

Welcome to | Recycling the Past - Architectural Salvage

Page Load Speed

948 ms in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

700 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

recyclingthepast.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to recyclingthepast.com homepage info - get ready to check Recycling The Past best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about recyclingthepast.com

We specialize in Architectural Salvage for the home and garden. We're always buying, from one piece to entire buildings

Visit recyclingthepast.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Recyclingthepast.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 848 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recyclingthepast.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.074

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

recyclingthepast.com

100 ms

www.recyclingthepast.com

205 ms

bootstrap.min.css

79 ms

font-awesome.min.css

87 ms

css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Recyclingthepast.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) belongs to the original domain Recyclingthepast.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Recyclingthepast.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 99.1 kB
  • After minification 95.6 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 96.0 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recycling The Past images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 102.4 kB
  • After minification 102.4 kB
  • After compression 83.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 36.9 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recyclingthepast.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (34%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recycling The Past. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

recyclingthepast.com

recyclingthepast.com

100 ms

www.recyclingthepast.com

www.recyclingthepast.com

205 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

79 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

87 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

58 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

111 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

185 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

155 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

196 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

25 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

234 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

156 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

RTP_logo.JPG

RTP_logo.JPG

147 ms

JoinOurList.png

JoinOurList.png

59 ms

social-logos.png

social-logos.png

107 ms

gargoyle.jpg

gargoyle.jpg

218 ms

RTP-WhiteOakFlooring-1a.jpg

RTP-WhiteOakFlooring-1a.jpg

239 ms

jesus.jpg

jesus.jpg

218 ms

SteelFactoryWindowsInUse2.jpg

SteelFactoryWindowsInUse2.jpg

223 ms

plane.jpg

plane.jpg

219 ms

DSC00143.JPG

DSC00143.JPG

219 ms

IMG_0598.JPG

IMG_0598.JPG

241 ms

IMG_0772.JPG

IMG_0772.JPG

239 ms

IMG_3984.JPG

IMG_3984.JPG

263 ms

Columns.jpg

Columns.jpg

249 ms

Claddinginterior1a.jpg

Claddinginterior1a.jpg

285 ms

IMG_4440-1.jpg

IMG_4440-1.jpg

272 ms

IMG_4018-2.jpg

IMG_4018-2.jpg

272 ms

IMG_5509.jpg

IMG_5509.jpg

273 ms

IMG_6730.jpg

IMG_6730.jpg

285 ms

RTP-Texas.jpg

RTP-Texas.jpg

295 ms

CSR64z1Qlv-GDxkbKVQ_fOAKSA.ttf

CSR64z1Qlv-GDxkbKVQ_fOAKSA.ttf

59 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

js

js

91 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

recyclingthepast.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

recyclingthepast.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

recyclingthepast.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recyclingthepast.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Recyclingthepast.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

recyclingthepast.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Recycling The Past. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: