Tools & Wizards About Us
redactiepartners.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

redactiepartners.nl

Contenture Full service communicatiebureau | We create thought leaders

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

751 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

545 ms

redactiepartners.nl screenshot

About Website

Visit redactiepartners.nl now to see the best up-to-date Redactiepartners content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about redactiepartners.nl

Contenture maakt organisaties inhoudelijk relevant in de maatschappij. Met onze data-inzichten en betrouwbare content worden klanten thought leaders.

Visit redactiepartners.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Redactiepartners.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 751 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

redactiepartners.nl performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.contenture.nl

751 ms

stylesheet.css

93 ms

js

104 ms

style.min.css

54 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Redactiepartners.nl, 10% (7 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) relates to the external source Contenture.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 272.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Redactiepartners.nl main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.9 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 83.3 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 182.5 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Redactiepartners images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 317.8 kB
  • After minification 317.8 kB
  • After compression 308.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 73.1 kB
  • After minification 73.1 kB
  • After compression 62.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redactiepartners.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (57%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redactiepartners. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.contenture.nl

www.contenture.nl

751 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

93 ms

js

js

104 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

54 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

55 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

55 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

185 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

278 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

370 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

280 ms

flexslider.min.css

flexslider.min.css

282 ms

swipebox.min.css

swipebox.min.css

283 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

284 ms

custom.css

custom.css

375 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

378 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

56 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

54 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

388 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

100 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

410 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

410 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

534 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

534 ms

jquery.swipebox.min.js

jquery.swipebox.min.js

534 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

534 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

52 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

534 ms

enquire.min.js

enquire.min.js

533 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

619 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

52 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

619 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

618 ms

ai-genius-form.js

ai-genius-form.js

617 ms

api.js

api.js

74 ms

e-202428.js

e-202428.js

52 ms

5uvb92rkqn

5uvb92rkqn

171 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

147 ms

Logocontenture2019WEB_wit.svg

Logocontenture2019WEB_wit.svg

218 ms

Index-Optie2_2000x480.jpg

Index-Optie2_2000x480.jpg

764 ms

strategie-analyse-content-1.png

strategie-analyse-content-1.png

396 ms

bgmotivelarge.png

bgmotivelarge.png

397 ms

6-1.png

6-1.png

675 ms

1-1.png

1-1.png

581 ms

5-1.png

5-1.png

766 ms

Allianz_Logo_300x200.png

Allianz_Logo_300x200.png

490 ms

Vitens_Logo_300x200.png

Vitens_Logo_300x200.png

490 ms

Philips_Logo_300x200.png

Philips_Logo_300x200.png

583 ms

Stibat_Logo_300x200.png

Stibat_Logo_300x200.png

583 ms

Veb_Logo_300x200-v2.png

Veb_Logo_300x200-v2.png

673 ms

Randstad_Logo_300x200.png

Randstad_Logo_300x200.png

675 ms

MoveMove_Logo_300x200.png

MoveMove_Logo_300x200.png

676 ms

ING_Logo_300x200.png

ING_Logo_300x200.png

767 ms

Rijksoverheid_Logo_300x200.png

Rijksoverheid_Logo_300x200.png

768 ms

contenture_klanten_logo_Gasunie.png

contenture_klanten_logo_Gasunie.png

767 ms

SER_Logo_300x200.png

SER_Logo_300x200.png

768 ms

contenture_klanten_logo_WUR.png

contenture_klanten_logo_WUR.png

855 ms

Index_Team_2000x480.jpg

Index_Team_2000x480.jpg

959 ms

BLOG-BEELD-UITGELICHTE-AFBEELDING-600x600.png

BLOG-BEELD-UITGELICHTE-AFBEELDING-600x600.png

951 ms

AI-Cursus-voor-Communicatie-praktijk-600x600.png

AI-Cursus-voor-Communicatie-praktijk-600x600.png

951 ms

Ontwerp-zonder-titel-3-600x600.jpg

Ontwerp-zonder-titel-3-600x600.jpg

860 ms

logo-cookieyes.svg

logo-cookieyes.svg

859 ms

azosans-regular-webfont.woff

azosans-regular-webfont.woff

827 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

924 ms

azosans-bold-webfont.woff

azosans-bold-webfont.woff

835 ms

azosans-medium-webfont.woff

azosans-medium-webfont.woff

915 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

8 ms

recaptcha__de.js

recaptcha__de.js

29 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

redactiepartners.nl accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

redactiepartners.nl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

redactiepartners.nl SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redactiepartners.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Redactiepartners.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

redactiepartners.nl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redactiepartners. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: