10.5 sec in total
2.1 sec
8 sec
457 ms
Click here to check amazing Redactorweb content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about redactorweb.es
Analizamos tu competencia, las características de tus páginas y mejoramos su presencia con la creación de estrategias de marketing de contenidos.
Visit redactorweb.esWe analyzed Redactorweb.es page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
redactorweb.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
2068 ms
367 ms
253 ms
279 ms
272 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Redactorweb.es, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Redactorweb.es.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (63%)
3.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Redactorweb.es main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 111.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Redactorweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 478.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 478.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redactorweb.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (71%)
83
24
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redactorweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.redactorweb.es
2068 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
367 ms
sociable.css
253 ms
styles.css
279 ms
cli-style.css
272 ms
settings.css
622 ms
css
24 ms
css
36 ms
css
46 ms
css
46 ms
settings.css
519 ms
bootstrap.min.css
681 ms
preset7.css
451 ms
font-awesome.min.css
592 ms
ionicons.min.css
613 ms
fonts.css
598 ms
style.min.css
818 ms
style-rtl.css
731 ms
shortcodes.css
922 ms
uikit.gradient.min.css
939 ms
uikit.almost-flat.min.css
1002 ms
uikit.min.css
993 ms
style.css
1050 ms
public.css
975 ms
js_composer.css
3135 ms
jquery.js
1464 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1133 ms
sociable.js
1145 ms
vuible.js
1186 ms
addtofavorites.js
1181 ms
cookielawinfo.js
1267 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1544 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1568 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
1771 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1502 ms
jquery_cookie.min.js
1666 ms
jsapi.js
1704 ms
shortcodes.js
1720 ms
uikit.min.js
1732 ms
plusone.js
40 ms
exp.parallax.js
1542 ms
main.js
1584 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1610 ms
scripts.js
1594 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1544 ms
js_composer_front.js
1482 ms
waypoints.min.js
1470 ms
core.min.js
1396 ms
widget.min.js
1428 ms
accordion.min.js
1440 ms
plusone.js
64 ms
30 ms
ui+en,table+en.css
4 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,geochart+en,table+en,corechart+en.I.js
62 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
ga.js
45 ms
redactor-web.png
364 ms
organicslide2bg.jpg
1050 ms
chibi.png
775 ms
sombrero.png
601 ms
slide-bg.jpg
882 ms
green.png
347 ms
red.png
487 ms
yellow.png
480 ms
counter.png
964 ms
77ecde_c7cdd031b0e14f85922aca2c23582d65.png_srz_186_164_85_22_0.50_1.20_0.png
658 ms
REDACCION-WEB-212x300.png
790 ms
chibi-327x600.png
1284 ms
analitica-contenido-150x150.png
966 ms
contenidos-web-150x150.png
974 ms
articulos-sociales-150x150.png
1021 ms
beneficios-contenidos-150x150.png
1089 ms
email-150x150.png
1107 ms
tick.png
1072 ms
geometry1.png
1471 ms
info.png
1185 ms
overlay.png
1186 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
255 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
255 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
254 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
255 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
255 ms
loader.gif
929 ms
large_left.png
933 ms
large_right.png
1037 ms
toggle_close.png
1031 ms
toggle_open.png
1075 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
Lato-Light.woff
1042 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1270 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1284 ms
tooltip.css
109 ms
redactorweb.es accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
redactorweb.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
redactorweb.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redactorweb.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Redactorweb.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redactorweb.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redactorweb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: