3.6 sec in total
242 ms
2.8 sec
509 ms
Click here to check amazing Redoma content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about redoma.digital
We develop proven solutions using WordPress and Microsoft Technologies. Web design, SEO, Software, Dynamics CRM & Advertising.
Visit redoma.digitalWe analyzed Redoma.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
redoma.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
242 ms
23 ms
174 ms
56 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Redoma.digital, 21% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Redoma.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 157.8 kB (14%)
1.2 MB
993.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Redoma.digital main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 579.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Redoma images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redoma.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (82%)
87
16
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redoma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.redoma.digital
242 ms
flick.css
23 ms
www.redoma.digital
174 ms
frontend.css
56 ms
timeline.css
30 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
26 ms
prettyPhoto.css
46 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
48 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
style.css
47 ms
style.css
54 ms
style.css
58 ms
style.css
59 ms
style.css
60 ms
style.css
81 ms
style.css
62 ms
plugins.min.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
77 ms
style.min.css
74 ms
ionicons.min.css
85 ms
style.css
91 ms
simple-line-icons.css
94 ms
dripicons.css
90 ms
blog.min.css
102 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
94 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
105 ms
modules.min.css
117 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
107 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
106 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
114 ms
style_dynamic.css
268 ms
js_composer.min.css
132 ms
css
46 ms
redoma.websitereview.css
126 ms
font-awesome.min.css
825 ms
hover.css
147 ms
style.css
145 ms
css
57 ms
css
60 ms
js
58 ms
Defaults.css
781 ms
rs6.css
139 ms
jquery.min.js
134 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
146 ms
scrollTo.js
129 ms
jquery.form.min.js
138 ms
mailchimp.js
293 ms
core.min.js
141 ms
datepicker.js
146 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
155 ms
jquery.timeline.min.js
154 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
170 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
170 ms
rollover.js
186 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
167 ms
rbtools.min.js
192 ms
rs6.min.js
196 ms
easy-testimonials-reveal.js
347 ms
email-decode.min.js
187 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
195 ms
mouse.min.js
199 ms
draggable.min.js
203 ms
tabs.min.js
229 ms
accordion.min.js
206 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
220 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
246 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
231 ms
third-party.min.js
257 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
232 ms
modules.min.js
239 ms
blog.min.js
232 ms
style.css
229 ms
comment-reply.min.js
244 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
242 ms
like.min.js
242 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
246 ms
11d476d76623564005b8522835ab6f45
102 ms
sbi-sprite.png
263 ms
Redoma-Digital-Web-Design-Logo.png
89 ms
landing-slide-1-layer-3.png
88 ms
dummy.png
101 ms
process-image-4.png
100 ms
process-image-1.png
87 ms
search-engine-optimization-seo-x192.png
100 ms
process-image-2.png
100 ms
video-banner.png
100 ms
original-graphic-1.png
166 ms
process-image-3.png
167 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
75 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
111 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
170 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
170 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
170 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
173 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
172 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
172 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
171 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
259 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
258 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
236 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf
170 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf
172 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf
173 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf
173 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf
172 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf
173 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf
173 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf
174 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf
175 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
258 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
174 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
176 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
174 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
176 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
175 ms
parallax-1.jpg
163 ms
process-bg.png
104 ms
parallax-1.jpg
70 ms
parallax-1.jpg
283 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
27 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
22 ms
redoma.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
redoma.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
redoma.digital SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redoma.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redoma.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redoma.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redoma. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: