Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

redsift.com

Red Sift. Cyber resilience starts here.

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

893 ms

Page Rendered

846 ms

redsift.com screenshot

About Website

Visit redsift.com now to see the best up-to-date Red Sift content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about redsift.com

Red Sift helps security teams understand and remediate cybersecurity risk before an incident happens. Internet-scale cybersecurity intelligence meets trusted AI.

Visit redsift.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Redsift.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

redsift.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.0 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

redsift.com

33 ms

redsift.com

31 ms

script.js

89 ms

gtm.js

143 ms

a74e69882c10abdf.css

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Redsift.com, 45% (56 requests) were made to Red-sift.cdn.prismic.io and 17% (21 requests) were made to Images.prismic.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (392 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 374.7 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

836.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Redsift.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 749.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 364.6 kB

  • Original 426.8 kB
  • After minification 425.5 kB
  • After compression 62.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 364.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 881 B

  • Original 749.3 kB
  • After minification 748.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Red Sift images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 35.1 kB
  • After minification 35.1 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (33%)

Requests Now

117

After Optimization

78

The browser has sent 117 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Red Sift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

redsift.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

redsift.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

redsift.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redsift.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redsift.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Red Sift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: