Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

reecetile.com

Flooring Store servicing Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, and Missouri | Mill Creek Carpet

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

671 ms

Page Rendered

900 ms

reecetile.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reecetile.com homepage info - get ready to check Reecetile best content right away, or after learning these important things about reecetile.com

Explore premium flooring; encounter exceptional, friendly aid at Mill Creek Carpet in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, and Missouri.

Visit reecetile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reecetile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reecetile.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,230 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.millcreekcarpet.com

144 ms

697ac2b5e0fd8e7e.css

62 ms

fe43b7d29de544f4.css

53 ms

c16ffbf8-f46792631b68a402.js

55 ms

953-883823de27668fd0.js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Reecetile.com, 34% (16 requests) were made to Clientassets.web.broadlume.com and 21% (10 requests) were made to Millcreekcarpet.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (309 ms) relates to the external source Clientassets.web.broadlume.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 525.2 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

596.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Reecetile.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 599.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 524.8 kB

  • Original 599.6 kB
  • After minification 587.7 kB
  • After compression 74.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 524.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 329.6 kB
  • After minification 329.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reecetile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 392 B

  • Original 179.5 kB
  • After minification 179.5 kB
  • After compression 179.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 94 B

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reecetile.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (43%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reecetile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

reecetile.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reecetile.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reecetile.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reecetile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reecetile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reecetile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: