Tools & Wizards About Us
reefkeeping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

reefkeeping.com

Reefkeeping Blog

Page Load Speed

22 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

21 sec

Page Rendered

871 ms

reefkeeping.com screenshot

About Website

Visit reefkeeping.com now to see the best up-to-date Reefkeeping content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reefkeeping.com

Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for the marine aquarist.

Visit reefkeeping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reefkeeping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 21.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reefkeeping.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reefkeeping.com

105 ms

reefkeeping-blog

20275 ms

highslide.js

33 ms

pub.min.js

7 ms

highslide.css

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Reefkeeping.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to S9.addthis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Free.xjs.lol. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Reefkeeping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reefkeeping.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 72.6 kB

  • Original 82.2 kB
  • After minification 75.9 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 57.3 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reefkeeping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 99.9 kB
  • After minification 99.9 kB
  • After compression 94.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 57.5 kB
  • After compression 28.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reefkeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (37%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

56

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reefkeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reefkeeping.com

reefkeeping.com

105 ms

reefkeeping-blog

reefkeeping-blog

20275 ms

highslide.js

highslide.js

33 ms

pub.min.js

pub.min.js

7 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

50 ms

modal.css

modal.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

53 ms

layout.css

layout.css

55 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

template.css

template.css

63 ms

styles.css

styles.css

76 ms

typography.css

typography.css

77 ms

system.css

system.css

78 ms

general.css

general.css

78 ms

rokmoomenu.css

rokmoomenu.css

82 ms

css_loader.php

css_loader.php

97 ms

mod_vvisit_counter.css

mod_vvisit_counter.css

100 ms

css_loader.php

css_loader.php

105 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

132 ms

modal.js

modal.js

104 ms

k2.js

k2.js

110 ms

rokfonts.js

rokfonts.js

125 ms

rokutils.js

rokutils.js

125 ms

rokutils.inputs.js

rokutils.inputs.js

147 ms

rokmoomenu.js

rokmoomenu.js

130 ms

mootools.bgiframe.js

mootools.bgiframe.js

149 ms

yahoo-dom-event.js

yahoo-dom-event.js

155 ms

container_core-min.js

container_core-min.js

152 ms

menu-min.js

menu-min.js

180 ms

widget.php

widget.php

149 ms

js

js

75 ms

button0-bm.gif

button0-bm.gif

142 ms

headerb.jpg

headerb.jpg

118 ms

headerb_cropped.jpg

headerb_cropped.jpg

115 ms

1005bgimagea.jpg

1005bgimagea.jpg

114 ms

header-overlay.png

header-overlay.png

116 ms

overlay-divider.png

overlay-divider.png

116 ms

bg-overlay.png

bg-overlay.png

116 ms

newsflash-overlay.png

newsflash-overlay.png

117 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

118 ms

maincontent-tm.png

maincontent-tm.png

119 ms

maincontent-tl.png

maincontent-tl.png

120 ms

maincontent-tr.png

maincontent-tr.png

118 ms

maincontent-m.png

maincontent-m.png

121 ms

maincontent-l.png

maincontent-l.png

119 ms

maincontent-r.png

maincontent-r.png

121 ms

maincontent-bg.png

maincontent-bg.png

122 ms

breadcrumb-home.png

breadcrumb-home.png

121 ms

Dec13CoverSM.jpg

Dec13CoverSM.jpg

123 ms

Nov13CoverSM.jpg

Nov13CoverSM.jpg

124 ms

Oct13CoverSM.jpg

Oct13CoverSM.jpg

125 ms

Sept13CoverSM.jpg

Sept13CoverSM.jpg

178 ms

Aug13CoverSM.jpg

Aug13CoverSM.jpg

124 ms

Jul13CoverSM.jpg

Jul13CoverSM.jpg

124 ms

Jun13CoverSM.jpg

Jun13CoverSM.jpg

178 ms

May13CoverSM.jpg

May13CoverSM.jpg

179 ms

April13CoverSM.jpg

April13CoverSM.jpg

180 ms

Mar13CoverSM.jpg

Mar13CoverSM.jpg

180 ms

Feb13CoverSM.jpg

Feb13CoverSM.jpg

181 ms

Jan13CoverSM.jpg

Jan13CoverSM.jpg

181 ms

vtoday.png

vtoday.png

181 ms

vyesterday.png

vyesterday.png

181 ms

vweek.png

vweek.png

182 ms

vlweek.png

vlweek.png

182 ms

vmonth.png

vmonth.png

182 ms

vlmonth.png

vlmonth.png

185 ms

vall.png

vall.png

186 ms

horizmenu-bg.png

horizmenu-bg.png

79 ms

totmicon.jpg

totmicon.jpg

77 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

122 ms

nominate1.gif

nominate1.gif

80 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

94 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

118 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

147 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

144 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

152 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

192 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

196 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

148 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

198 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

191 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

175 ms

FTSsm.jpg

FTSsm.jpg

207 ms

maincontent-bm.png

maincontent-bm.png

207 ms

maincontent-bl.png

maincontent-bl.png

216 ms

maincontent-br.png

maincontent-br.png

220 ms

sidemod-tm.png

sidemod-tm.png

219 ms

sidemod-tl.png

sidemod-tl.png

221 ms

sidemod-tr.png

sidemod-tr.png

180 ms

sidemod-bg.png

sidemod-bg.png

177 ms

menubaritem_submenuindicator.png

menubaritem_submenuindicator.png

186 ms

zoomin.cur

zoomin.cur

30 ms

drop-shadow.png

drop-shadow.png

29 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

32 ms

loader.white.gif

loader.white.gif

32 ms

Dec13Cover.jpg

Dec13Cover.jpg

32 ms

Accessibility Review

reefkeeping.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

reefkeeping.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

reefkeeping.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reefkeeping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reefkeeping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reefkeeping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reefkeeping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: