27.9 sec in total
3.6 sec
24 sec
251 ms
Visit reetresult2016.in now to see the best up-to-date Reetresult 2016 content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reetresult2016.in
REET Result 2016: REET exam result date with REET result 2016 name wise, by roll number, Merit list, Cut off marks list and score card news available here.
Visit reetresult2016.inWe analyzed Reetresult2016.in page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 24.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
reetresult2016.in performance score
3611 ms
164 ms
1564 ms
1445 ms
1708 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Reetresult2016.in, 12% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Streamtest.github.io.
Page size can be reduced by 143.2 kB (55%)
258.5 kB
115.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reetresult2016.in main page is 258.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 97.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reetresult 2016 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reetresult2016.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (61%)
31
12
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reetresult 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reetresult2016.in
3611 ms
ga.js
164 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1564 ms
diggdigg-style.css
1445 ms
dashicons.min.css
1708 ms
css
313 ms
style.css
1448 ms
custom.css
1453 ms
jetpack.css
1468 ms
jquery.min.js
312 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
308 ms
streamtest.js
20156 ms
photon.js
2363 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
303 ms
gprofiles.js
304 ms
wpgroho.js
2338 ms
selectnav.js
1690 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1809 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1809 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1943 ms
e-201614.js
296 ms
__utm.gif
67 ms
REET-Level-1-2-result-2016.png
2665 ms
ontoplist32.png
1185 ms
v_91206.gif
3789 ms
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
9254 ms
ezgif.com-crop-4.png
1263 ms
REET-Scorecard-2016-REET-2016-result-Reet-result-2016.png
2535 ms
REET-Cut-off-marks-2016.png
2669 ms
REET-Result-2016-check-here.png
2656 ms
hovercard.css
97 ms
services.css
99 ms
g.gif
29 ms
reetresult2016.in SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reetresult2016.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reetresult2016.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reetresult2016.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reetresult 2016. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: