Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

reezom.net

Radio Jingles & Branding | Reezom - When Brand Matters

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

643 ms

reezom.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reezom.net homepage info - get ready to check Reezom best content right away, or after learning these important things about reezom.net

We shape Radio Jingles, Jingle Packages which match your on-air brand and playlist. Audio Branding, Explainers Video. Trendy & affordable.

Visit reezom.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Reezom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reezom.net performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reezom.net

93 ms

www.reezom.net

126 ms

dizbc.css

21 ms

dizbc.css

48 ms

dnzrd.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Reezom.net, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Reezom.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reezom.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 147.4 kB (22%)

Content Size

669.0 kB

After Optimization

521.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Reezom.net main page is 669.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 484.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 146.8 kB

  • Original 179.8 kB
  • After minification 179.7 kB
  • After compression 33.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 595 B

  • Original 484.8 kB
  • After minification 484.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reezom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (80%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reezom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

reezom.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

reezom.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

reezom.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reezom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reezom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reezom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: