3.3 sec in total
829 ms
2 sec
478 ms
Welcome to refereedecisions.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Refereedecisions best content right away, or after learning these important things about refereedecisions.co.uk
Visit refereedecisions.co.ukWe analyzed Refereedecisions.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 829 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
refereedecisions.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
829 ms
307 ms
209 ms
10 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Refereedecisions.co.uk, 16% (3 requests) were made to 1.gravatar.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (829 ms) belongs to the original domain Refereedecisions.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 190.9 kB (72%)
266.9 kB
75.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Refereedecisions.co.uk main page is 266.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 185.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Refereedecisions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 142.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Refereedecisions.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)
18
8
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Refereedecisions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.refereedecisions.co.uk
829 ms
style.css
307 ms
wp_cat_rss_style.css
209 ms
buttons.js
10 ms
comment-reply.min.js
183 ms
wp-embed.min.js
183 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
211 ms
8319a17342ec647951eac6dc620c69ed
110 ms
916c3cb43c1a4803a4f38788f677d48f
119 ms
4490290eae89b6453ddc020ebd854e36
109 ms
Banner1.jpg
117 ms
rss_small_icon.png
111 ms
wordpress.png
104 ms
d55dc66da7f799876a96e12d968ffa71
94 ms
463d82806576d26bdb39de5a4f334f4e
97 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
53 ms
getSegment.php
220 ms
checkOAuth.esi
7 ms
t.dhj
24 ms
refereedecisions.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
refereedecisions.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
refereedecisions.co.uk SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Refereedecisions.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Refereedecisions.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
refereedecisions.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Refereedecisions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: