Tools & Wizards About Us
refereedjournals.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

refereedjournals.com

Premium Domain Names at already Discounted Prices - refereedjournals.com is available for sale! Make an Offer Today. 777

Page Load Speed

850 ms in total

First Response

154 ms

Resources Loaded

500 ms

Page Rendered

196 ms

refereedjournals.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Refereedjournals content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about refereedjournals.com

Search premium discount domains and check out the Domain Deal of the Day.

Visit refereedjournals.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Refereedjournals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 696 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

refereedjournals.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

refereedjournals.com

154 ms

refereedjournals.com

68 ms

gtm.js

69 ms

bootstrap.first.min.css

20 ms

style.first.min.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Refereedjournals.com, 71% (40 requests) were made to Perfectdomain.com and 23% (13 requests) were made to Assets.perfectdomain.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (154 ms) belongs to the original domain Refereedjournals.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.8 kB (30%)

Content Size

258.1 kB

After Optimization

180.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Refereedjournals.com main page is 258.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 134.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 51.6 kB
  • After minification 45.1 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 134.2 kB
  • After minification 100.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Refereedjournals needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 426 B

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 62.4 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Refereedjournals.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Refereedjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

refereedjournals.com

refereedjournals.com

154 ms

refereedjournals.com

refereedjournals.com

68 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

69 ms

bootstrap.first.min.css

bootstrap.first.min.css

20 ms

style.first.min.css

style.first.min.css

48 ms

dn_icon.svg

dn_icon.svg

37 ms

menu-icon.svg

menu-icon.svg

33 ms

Shape10-min.svg

Shape10-min.svg

38 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

36 ms

noun_bulb_950363.svg

noun_bulb_950363.svg

34 ms

stars-4.5.svg

stars-4.5.svg

69 ms

heart2.svg

heart2.svg

65 ms

heart.svg

heart.svg

66 ms

angle-down.svg

angle-down.svg

62 ms

payment-option-paypal.png

payment-option-paypal.png

67 ms

payment-option-visa.png

payment-option-visa.png

69 ms

payment-option-american.png

payment-option-american.png

83 ms

payment-option-master.png

payment-option-master.png

85 ms

payment-option-wire.png

payment-option-wire.png

86 ms

payment-option-bitcoin.png

payment-option-bitcoin.png

85 ms

partner-godaddy-sized.png

partner-godaddy-sized.png

83 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

90 ms

Path8138.svg

Path8138.svg

86 ms

Group589.svg

Group589.svg

87 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

91 ms

js

js

65 ms

defer.js

defer.js

86 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

90 ms

ejs.min.js

ejs.min.js

105 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

104 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

107 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

106 ms

recommendation.api

recommendation.api

24 ms

6ca3d7ccd79e4636e2d1a1192497bf4a_l.jpg

6ca3d7ccd79e4636e2d1a1192497bf4a_l.jpg

52 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

17 ms

Roboto-Medium.woff

Roboto-Medium.woff

26 ms

Roboto-Regular.woff

Roboto-Regular.woff

29 ms

Roboto-Bold.woff

Roboto-Bold.woff

23 ms

inner.search.domains.ejs

inner.search.domains.ejs

14 ms

7a4c4511687c8c903ab93b09325cf156.jpg

7a4c4511687c8c903ab93b09325cf156.jpg

16 ms

c46be32c984415118dff84c985da43ed.jpg

c46be32c984415118dff84c985da43ed.jpg

29 ms

807384c0ef02206d3475c6d4be8a79af.jpg

807384c0ef02206d3475c6d4be8a79af.jpg

17 ms

94bffe293ebe21d0f8a217d82b8a01c5.jpg

94bffe293ebe21d0f8a217d82b8a01c5.jpg

14 ms

3b35d70a4a5d5c55717b3406f71a7f96.jpg

3b35d70a4a5d5c55717b3406f71a7f96.jpg

24 ms

42e5bd6894c60a220dc9970950a2cb5a.jpg

42e5bd6894c60a220dc9970950a2cb5a.jpg

15 ms

e4606932a84ec3db5e0d03f725272926.jpg

e4606932a84ec3db5e0d03f725272926.jpg

27 ms

5236e801dd131575a12dc0ac97c990e2.jpg

5236e801dd131575a12dc0ac97c990e2.jpg

23 ms

caa37702958bfd0b3ecbca6f557ee633.jpg

caa37702958bfd0b3ecbca6f557ee633.jpg

51 ms

4ed3c84be5c1bcecb7bc0d78ae53b70e.jpg

4ed3c84be5c1bcecb7bc0d78ae53b70e.jpg

27 ms

6aafb11f928a037ebd528443906fdc9b.jpg

6aafb11f928a037ebd528443906fdc9b.jpg

64 ms

cc450197194423aa28e4b6e5b6868c3d.jpg

cc450197194423aa28e4b6e5b6868c3d.jpg

34 ms

noun_Info.svg

noun_Info.svg

20 ms

xyz-ads_r1_300x250_anniversary.png

xyz-ads_r1_300x250_anniversary.png

21 ms

xyz-ads_r1_300x50_anniversary.png

xyz-ads_r1_300x50_anniversary.png

21 ms

Group828.svg

Group828.svg

18 ms

Group829.svg

Group829.svg

17 ms

Accessibility Review

refereedjournals.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

refereedjournals.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

refereedjournals.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Refereedjournals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Refereedjournals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

refereedjournals.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Refereedjournals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: