Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

refoodle.com

Online Food Ordering System With Contactless Table Ordering

Page Load Speed

11.3 sec in total

First Response

263 ms

Resources Loaded

10.3 sec

Page Rendered

658 ms

refoodle.com screenshot

About Website

Visit refoodle.com now to see the best up-to-date Re Food Le content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about refoodle.com

Free online food ordering system + more for restaurants, cafe's, pubs and more. ZERO COMMISSION. The cheaper alternative to just eat, uber eats or deliveroo.

Visit refoodle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Refoodle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

refoodle.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.21

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

refoodle.com

263 ms

foodbooking.uk

453 ms

07ab8f27117aa82b7373f5df24b2c701.css

272 ms

16e9422bead36d7323d8eaa996fd7418.css

260 ms

bbd570fd56a8fcacde06687abbcbf023.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 154 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Refoodle.com, 46% (71 requests) were made to Foodbooking.uk and 21% (32 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Foodbooking.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

937.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Refoodle.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 438.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 270.0 kB

  • Original 320.4 kB
  • After minification 320.2 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 270.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4 B

  • Original 438.5 kB
  • After minification 438.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Food Le images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 389.4 kB
  • After minification 389.4 kB
  • After compression 364.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 295 B

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 83.9 kB
  • After compression 83.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Refoodle.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (63%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Food Le. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

refoodle.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

refoodle.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

refoodle.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Refoodle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Refoodle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Re Food Le. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: