Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

refraction.in

refractionofficial

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

371 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

798 ms

refraction.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Refraction content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about refraction.in

refractionofficial

Visit refraction.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Refraction.in page load time and found that the first response time was 371 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

refraction.in performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.14

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

refraction.in

371 ms

gtm.js

73 ms

js

148 ms

aos.js

33 ms

constants.js

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Refraction.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Refraction.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (15%)

Content Size

14.2 MB

After Optimization

12.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Refraction.in main page is 14.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 97.9 kB

  • Original 126.2 kB
  • After minification 119.2 kB
  • After compression 28.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 2.0 MB

  • Original 13.6 MB
  • After minification 11.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Refraction needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 57.5 kB

  • Original 422.0 kB
  • After minification 422.0 kB
  • After compression 364.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 63.7 kB
  • After compression 61.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Refraction.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (75%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Refraction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

refraction.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

refraction.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

refraction.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Refraction.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Refraction.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Refraction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: