3.3 sec in total
260 ms
2.5 sec
547 ms
Click here to check amazing Refresh Debt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about refreshdebt.co.uk
Refresh Debt Advice helps people regain control of their finances by providing confidential advice, support, and solutions.
Visit refreshdebt.co.ukWe analyzed Refreshdebt.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
refreshdebt.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value5,590 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.342
33/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
260 ms
779 ms
39 ms
725 ms
322 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Refreshdebt.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Refreshdebt.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 513.0 kB (40%)
1.3 MB
764.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Refreshdebt.co.uk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 628.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 434.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 434.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Refresh Debt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (92%)
76
6
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Refresh Debt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 71 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
refreshdebt.co.uk
260 ms
refreshdebt.co.uk
779 ms
css
39 ms
7c0616927d9c0249682be7c1220f0eb0.css
725 ms
jquery.min.js
322 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
243 ms
fixed-menu.js
246 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
256 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
323 ms
custom.min.js
329 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
335 ms
headings.min.js
341 ms
creative-link.min.js
402 ms
js
58 ms
js
114 ms
main.min.js
565 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
333 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
341 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
431 ms
hooks.min.js
402 ms
wppopups.js
414 ms
app.js
427 ms
morphext.min.js
480 ms
welcomebar-front.js
497 ms
rbtools.min.js
597 ms
rs6.min.js
959 ms
wprev-public-com-min.js
559 ms
post-type.min.js
578 ms
info-box.min.js
640 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
956 ms
core.min.js
957 ms
mouse.min.js
957 ms
controlgroup.min.js
958 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
957 ms
button.min.js
958 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
959 ms
draggable.min.js
960 ms
droppable.min.js
959 ms
sortable.min.js
1055 ms
datepicker.min.js
1055 ms
resizable.min.js
897 ms
dialog.min.js
893 ms
tabs.min.js
888 ms
slider.min.js
883 ms
spinner.min.js
887 ms
progressbar.min.js
885 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
880 ms
jquery.printelement.min.js
874 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
866 ms
jquery.json.min.js
807 ms
menu.min.js
852 ms
dom-ready.min.js
844 ms
i18n.min.js
782 ms
a11y.min.js
769 ms
autocomplete.min.js
756 ms
jquery.keyboard.min.js
753 ms
jquery.validationEngine.min.js
806 ms
jquery.validationEngine-all.min.js
788 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
726 ms
jquery.typewatch.min.js
721 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
707 ms
countUp.min.js
688 ms
bat.js
296 ms
gtm.js
287 ms
fbevents.js
348 ms
tooltipster.bundle.min.js
470 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
408 ms
jquery.ipt-plugin-uif-front.min.js
407 ms
waves.min.js
409 ms
jquery.eform-material.min.js
402 ms
js.cookie.min.js
403 ms
jquery.ipt-fsqm-form.min.js
549 ms
sayt.jquery.min.js
549 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
549 ms
lazyload.min.js
599 ms
home-header4.jpg
600 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
432 ms
font
156 ms
font
199 ms
refreshdebt.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
refreshdebt.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
refreshdebt.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Refreshdebt.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Refreshdebt.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
refreshdebt.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Refresh Debt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: