Tools & Wizards About Us
regencysecurity.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

regencysecurity.co.uk

Home - Regency Security Group Ltd

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

923 ms

regencysecurity.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit regencysecurity.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Regency Security content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about regencysecurity.co.uk

Visit regencysecurity.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Regencysecurity.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

regencysecurity.co.uk performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

regencysecurity.co.uk

205 ms

regencysecurity.co.uk

1464 ms

www.regencysecurity.co.uk

2050 ms

sgr.css

78 ms

wsp-front-preloader.css

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Regencysecurity.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Regencysecurity.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 284.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Regencysecurity.co.uk main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 129.6 kB

  • Original 154.8 kB
  • After minification 151.9 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Regency Security images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 511.7 kB
  • After minification 511.7 kB
  • After compression 509.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 146.2 kB

  • Original 294.3 kB
  • After minification 293.6 kB
  • After compression 148.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Regencysecurity.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.2 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (68%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Regency Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

regencysecurity.co.uk

regencysecurity.co.uk

205 ms

regencysecurity.co.uk

regencysecurity.co.uk

1464 ms

www.regencysecurity.co.uk

www.regencysecurity.co.uk

2050 ms

sgr.css

sgr.css

78 ms

wsp-front-preloader.css

wsp-front-preloader.css

156 ms

wsp-smart-preload-style.css

wsp-smart-preload-style.css

231 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

463 ms

styles.css

styles.css

233 ms

uaf.css

uaf.css

234 ms

app.min.css

app.min.css

399 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

393 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

306 ms

style.css

style.css

623 ms

element-fancy-box.css

element-fancy-box.css

314 ms

element-scrolling-text.css

element-scrolling-text.css

383 ms

element-post-grid.css

element-post-grid.css

472 ms

element-clients.css

element-clients.css

459 ms

caroufredsel.css

caroufredsel.css

471 ms

cf7.css

cf7.css

476 ms

css

css

78 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

539 ms

flickity.css

flickity.css

542 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

552 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

548 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

555 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

768 ms

style.css

style.css

618 ms

style.css

style.css

627 ms

global.css

global.css

628 ms

dark-mode.css

dark-mode.css

631 ms

desktop.css

desktop.css

694 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

696 ms

newsletter-style.css

newsletter-style.css

701 ms

css

css

36 ms

sgr.js

sgr.js

705 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

788 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

778 ms

wsp-main-script.js

wsp-main-script.js

779 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

934 ms

global.js

global.js

782 ms

js

js

91 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

839 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

779 ms

core.css

core.css

703 ms

slide-out-right-hover.css

slide-out-right-hover.css

638 ms

smart-slider.js

smart-slider.js

640 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

693 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

624 ms

index.js

index.js

619 ms

index.js

index.js

606 ms

wp-dark-mode-ultimate.min.js

wp-dark-mode-ultimate.min.js

593 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

712 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

655 ms

priority.js

priority.js

649 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

642 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

641 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

640 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

575 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

572 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

567 ms

caroufredsel.min.js

caroufredsel.min.js

686 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

686 ms

flickity.js

flickity.js

622 ms

stickkit.js

stickkit.js

622 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

621 ms

init.js

init.js

706 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

703 ms

index.js

index.js

625 ms

newsletter-draggable.js

newsletter-draggable.js

624 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

632 ms

Logo1.jpg

Logo1.jpg

297 ms

Logo-2.jpg

Logo-2.jpg

450 ms

Logo-3.jpg

Logo-3.jpg

451 ms

Logo-4.jpg

Logo-4.jpg

453 ms

Logo-14.jpg

Logo-14.jpg

450 ms

Logo-13.jpg

Logo-13.jpg

451 ms

Logo-12.jpg

Logo-12.jpg

392 ms

Logo-10.jpg

Logo-10.jpg

502 ms

Logo-11.jpg

Logo-11.jpg

522 ms

Logo-9.jpg

Logo-9.jpg

527 ms

Logo-7.jpg

Logo-7.jpg

528 ms

Logo-6.jpg

Logo-6.jpg

532 ms

Logo-5.jpg

Logo-5.jpg

538 ms

Logo-15.jpg

Logo-15.jpg

555 ms

Logo-16.jpg

Logo-16.jpg

598 ms

Logo-17.jpg

Logo-17.jpg

608 ms

Logo-18.jpg

Logo-18.jpg

611 ms

Regency-New-Main-Logo-2024-Black.svg

Regency-New-Main-Logo-2024-Black.svg

381 ms

united-kingdom.svg

united-kingdom.svg

496 ms

location.svg

location.svg

497 ms

compliant.svg

compliant.svg

498 ms

charity.svg

charity.svg

499 ms

DS4.jpg

DS4.jpg

589 ms

Group-51.jpg

Group-51.jpg

500 ms

Photo-23-02-2019-20-53-29.jpg

Photo-23-02-2019-20-53-29.jpg

695 ms

Regency-New-Logo-White-2024.png

Regency-New-Logo-White-2024.png

539 ms

UKAS-ISO-logo.jpg

UKAS-ISO-logo.jpg

543 ms

bx-right-arrow-alt.svg

bx-right-arrow-alt.svg

502 ms

5110Forma-DJR-Text-Light.woff

5110Forma-DJR-Text-Light.woff

294 ms

1808Forma-DJR-Text-Itali.woff

1808Forma-DJR-Text-Itali.woff

363 ms

3935Forma-DJR-Text-Bold.woff

3935Forma-DJR-Text-Bold.woff

394 ms

9346Forma-DJR-Text-Regul.woff

9346Forma-DJR-Text-Regul.woff

395 ms

4824Forma-DJR-Italic.woff

4824Forma-DJR-Italic.woff

395 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

433 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

689 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

52 ms

newsletter-mobile-style.css

newsletter-mobile-style.css

79 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

155 ms

Accessibility Review

regencysecurity.co.uk accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

regencysecurity.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

regencysecurity.co.uk SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Regencysecurity.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Regencysecurity.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

regencysecurity.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Regency Security. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: