4.9 sec in total
563 ms
4.1 sec
184 ms
Visit regionfox.ru now to see the best up-to-date Regionfox content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about regionfox.ru
ООО Регион-М, окрасочное и компрессорное оборудование. Оборудование для ппу.
Visit regionfox.ruWe analyzed Regionfox.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 563 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
regionfox.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
563 ms
1226 ms
138 ms
276 ms
529 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Regionfox.ru, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Regionfox.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 163.3 kB (8%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Regionfox.ru main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Regionfox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Regionfox.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (63%)
60
22
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Regionfox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
regionfox.ru
563 ms
regionfox.ru
1226 ms
kernel_main.css
138 ms
page_7f1bd0c26ba69ed42e5d1018236a53bc.css
276 ms
template_4324446cdfbc8c9a4c40d23e082f32f5.css
529 ms
colorpicker.css
407 ms
admin.css
410 ms
controls.css
407 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
415 ms
s1.css
416 ms
popup.min.css
543 ms
css
29 ms
css
46 ms
css
52 ms
kernel_main.js
814 ms
core_db.min.js
598 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
598 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
707 ms
template_43ee152dbaf5ec9e0353c611b305abd3.js
920 ms
colorpicker.js
683 ms
mask.min.js
683 ms
core.js
692 ms
functions.js
836 ms
classes.js
835 ms
catalog.js
836 ms
controls.js
846 ms
basket.js
950 ms
controls.js
952 ms
functions.js
952 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
962 ms
006f7ee552aa7ac018e4799fa5064589.jpg
1110 ms
settings_icon.png
565 ms
search_icon_header.png
566 ms
compare.png
566 ms
startshop.basket.icon.png
567 ms
4ba446f5e35f1c003b08672cfbfb59e9.jpg
818 ms
37b537f769c2b8fa71766acf1d2e0a25.png
580 ms
3e64561b0e2594ff6725f65082db2c61.png
636 ms
4a56559e2c8a9fb849378d78c003146a.png
677 ms
a23c762385d4fc9c2382672baf75e60e.jpg
848 ms
d890795bddabe601f611fe47e3f1faea.jpg
810 ms
3e789135146619f0c330aca5220cac61.jpg
720 ms
1a37b62b9a003df107c5fc84360d70a9.JPG
768 ms
0f971b4a7016b75b4b33c13f3bb319f3.jpg
823 ms
73dbeda08885f556deab74e3a2f0aaa9.png
999 ms
442906390703d14dcbde6d89c42cf3fe.jpg
900 ms
19b2f2b8a905408cfebccec280c9ddca.jpg
949 ms
0c22b7972055d59f8fad3e9ee703f3b7.jpg
953 ms
sprite_social.png
960 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKew7z.ttf
25 ms
UbuntuRegular.woff
1072 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jtGyI.ttf
82 ms
UbuntuMedium.woff
992 ms
UbuntuLight.woff
1174 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjtGyI.ttf
41 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9e6Vc.ttf
91 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9e6Vc.ttf
64 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEwA.ttf
44 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKA.ttf
44 ms
UbuntuBold.woff
963 ms
LDxbnywGOe
280 ms
ba.js
284 ms
uni-slider-buttons.png
663 ms
watch.js
121 ms
bx_loader.gif
580 ms
bae2c70ab5ab4e0f3b55460e03d9c0c4.jpg
611 ms
5035c6754db92f5a61b7529519dbaeea.jpg
672 ms
a39e1f8d840e46acf95fc3ffb9b22930.jpg
945 ms
3cbd1304cf69adaeafc927a28533ce62.jpg
961 ms
6ecf374a51675957eded6cc20a2c6f87.jpg
858 ms
4fe14c99997d6de7c683da8b0c670e84.jpg
763 ms
LDxbnywGOe
190 ms
bx_stat
183 ms
LDxbnywGOe
653 ms
bundle_ru_RU.js
228 ms
regionfox.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
regionfox.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
regionfox.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Regionfox.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Regionfox.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
regionfox.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Regionfox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: