6.4 sec in total
2.5 sec
3.7 sec
240 ms
Click here to check amazing Reituca content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reituca.net
Keywords
Visit reituca.netWe analyzed Reituca.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
reituca.net performance score
2460 ms
59 ms
122 ms
237 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Reituca.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Use.edgefonts.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Html5shim.googlecode.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Reituca.net.
Page size can be reduced by 585.2 kB (53%)
1.1 MB
514.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reituca.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 417.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reituca needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 206.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 206.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 315.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reituca.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)
52
18
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reituca. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reituca.net
2460 ms
lobster.js
59 ms
fblb.css
122 ms
lionbars.css
237 ms
skeleton.css
238 ms
base.css
322 ms
custom.css
265 ms
layout.css
264 ms
style.css
216 ms
settings.css
336 ms
captions.css
337 ms
shortcodes.css
510 ms
prettyPhoto.css
445 ms
jquery.js
531 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
435 ms
userscripts.js
452 ms
jquery.lionbars.0.3.min.js
423 ms
html5.js
22 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
528 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
587 ms
mobile-menu-init.js
588 ms
init.js
587 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
603 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
631 ms
js
58 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
670 ms
init.js
665 ms
cforms2012.css
672 ms
cforms.js
665 ms
wp-activity.css
695 ms
wp-embed.min.js
722 ms
core.min.js
745 ms
fscf-scripts.js
744 ms
reituca.net
203 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
500 ms
calendar.css
109 ms
ados.js
26 ms
Rlogo-T.png
140 ms
phptLCUhYAM1.jpg
177 ms
phpwzAxAjAM.jpg
254 ms
Sticks1.jpg
186 ms
phpeKin1nAM1.jpg
269 ms
phpmaRPMDAM.jpg
349 ms
Rlogo.png
294 ms
phpYcRUzTAM.jpg
296 ms
timer.png
154 ms
loader.gif
204 ms
shadow3.png
247 ms
ados
10 ms
9kpG4-FrvdB5vbXteuhWV2LCNTWWzPIS5bZEyQeasKqffHQIggMdeMJ6Mk6fwyBuSh90ZAs1ZAZzd1sDOco8i26I.woff
28 ms
p.gif
130 ms
arrow_left.png
88 ms
arrow_right.png
89 ms
arrow_large_left.png
89 ms
arrow_large_right.png
90 ms
reituca.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reituca.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reituca.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reituca.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reituca. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: