Tools & Wizards About Us
rejector.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

rejector.ru

Rejector.ru - Контроль доступа к интернет, быстрый и бесплатный DNS, родительский контроль.

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

456 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

106 ms

rejector.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit rejector.ru now to see the best up-to-date Rejector content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rejector.ru

Rejector.ru - это централизованный проект для контроля доступа к интернет. Если вам необходимо оградить детей и подростков от опасной информации в интернете, контролировать интересы и доступ сотрудник...

Visit rejector.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rejector.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rejector.ru performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rejector.ru

456 ms

main.css

97 ms

odkl_share.css

519 ms

openapi.js

286 ms

social_buttons.js

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Rejector.ru, 20% (9 requests) were made to St6-21.vk.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) relates to the external source St6-21.vk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

361.6 kB

After Optimization

288.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rejector.ru main page is 361.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 144.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 13.6 kB
  • After minification 13.5 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 64.7 kB
  • After minification 61.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rejector images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 138.8 kB
  • After minification 138.8 kB
  • After compression 115.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 144.5 kB
  • After minification 144.5 kB
  • After compression 107.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rejector.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (59%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rejector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rejector.ru

rejector.ru

456 ms

main.css

main.css

97 ms

odkl_share.css

odkl_share.css

519 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

286 ms

social_buttons.js

social_buttons.js

193 ms

odkl_share.css

odkl_share.css

684 ms

header_bgr.png

header_bgr.png

96 ms

logo.png

logo.png

96 ms

corner.png

corner.png

95 ms

icon_info.gif

icon_info.gif

188 ms

nav_active_left.png

nav_active_left.png

190 ms

nav_active_right.png

nav_active_right.png

190 ms

defender.jpg

defender.jpg

285 ms

shield.png

shield.png

258 ms

input_bgr.png

input_bgr.png

163 ms

ckeckbox_bgr.png

ckeckbox_bgr.png

253 ms

logon_button_bgr.png

logon_button_bgr.png

255 ms

icon_parents.png

icon_parents.png

256 ms

icon_administrator.png

icon_administrator.png

257 ms

icon_users.png

icon_users.png

347 ms

icon_director.png

icon_director.png

349 ms

footer_shield.png

footer_shield.png

349 ms

ga.js

ga.js

9 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

tweet_button.html

tweet_button.html

61 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

255 ms

widget_like.php

widget_like.php

260 ms

like.php

like.php

435 ms

embeds

embeds

70 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

535 ms

TttXWwYVW0v.js

TttXWwYVW0v.js

27 ms

GzgedhmzSQa.png

GzgedhmzSQa.png

18 ms

widget_like.php

widget_like.php

193 ms

loader_nav21007247412_3.js

loader_nav21007247412_3.js

298 ms

lite.ca486089.css

lite.ca486089.css

786 ms

lang3_2.js

lang3_2.js

806 ms

c3d11fba.2ecb05ac.js

c3d11fba.2ecb05ac.js

683 ms

vkui.43318ab6.css

vkui.43318ab6.css

855 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

686 ms

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

687 ms

al_like.js

al_like.js

692 ms

base.76878bfc.css

base.76878bfc.css

809 ms

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

269 ms

like_widget.png

like_widget.png

89 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

89 ms

Accessibility Review

rejector.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rejector.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rejector.ru SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rejector.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rejector.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rejector.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rejector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: