Tools & Wizards About Us
relevancy.link screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

relevancy.link

Relevancy

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

255 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

relevancy.link screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Relevancy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about relevancy.link

Visit relevancy.link

Key Findings

We analyzed Relevancy.link page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

relevancy.link performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.relevancy.link

255 ms

styles.css

152 ms

css

48 ms

style.min.css

363 ms

responsive.min.css

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Relevancy.link, 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (505 ms) belongs to the original domain Relevancy.link.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.3 kB (17%)

Content Size

444.8 kB

After Optimization

369.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Relevancy.link main page is 444.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 197.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 75.0 kB

  • Original 93.8 kB
  • After minification 93.6 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 197.8 kB
  • After minification 197.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Relevancy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 67 B

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 82.3 kB
  • After compression 82.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 266 B

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 70.8 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Relevancy.link has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (44%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Relevancy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.relevancy.link

www.relevancy.link

255 ms

styles.css

styles.css

152 ms

css

css

48 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

363 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

174 ms

style.css

style.css

180 ms

index.js

index.js

10 ms

index.js

index.js

17 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

us.core.min.js

us.core.min.js

31 ms

logo.png

logo.png

121 ms

background-top.jpg

background-top.jpg

384 ms

boost-background.jpg

boost-background.jpg

368 ms

font

font

26 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

319 ms

font

font

39 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

440 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

459 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

505 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

371 ms

quote.png

quote.png

9 ms

Accessibility Review

relevancy.link accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

relevancy.link best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

relevancy.link SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relevancy.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Relevancy.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

relevancy.link

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Relevancy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: