Tools & Wizards About Us
reliantmanager.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

reliantmanager.com

Reliant Property Management

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

39 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

948 ms

reliantmanager.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reliantmanager.com homepage info - get ready to check Reliant Manager best content right away, or after learning these important things about reliantmanager.com

Visit reliantmanager.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reliantmanager.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reliantmanager.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.107

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reliantmanager.com

39 ms

reliantmanager.com

432 ms

bootstrap.min.css

516 ms

font-awesome.min.css

448 ms

flaticon.css

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Reliantmanager.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reliantmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (12%)

Content Size

23.8 MB

After Optimization

20.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reliantmanager.com main page is 23.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 96.3 kB
  • After minification 64.2 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.0 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 22.4 MB
  • After minification 20.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reliant Manager images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 489.4 kB

  • Original 675.9 kB
  • After minification 664.6 kB
  • After compression 186.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 489.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 535.0 kB

  • Original 624.6 kB
  • After minification 522.1 kB
  • After compression 89.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reliantmanager.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 535.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (41%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reliant Manager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reliantmanager.com

reliantmanager.com

39 ms

reliantmanager.com

reliantmanager.com

432 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

516 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

448 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

317 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

292 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

280 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

406 ms

lightgallery.css

lightgallery.css

609 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

639 ms

royal-preload.css

royal-preload.css

585 ms

style.css

style.css

953 ms

settings.css

settings.css

798 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

920 ms

js

js

75 ms

js

js

132 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

911 ms

mousewheel.min.js

mousewheel.min.js

610 ms

lightgallery-all.min.js

lightgallery-all.min.js

878 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

767 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

760 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1127 ms

easypiechart.min.js

easypiechart.min.js

855 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

1126 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1223 ms

royal_preloader.min.js

royal_preloader.min.js

1130 ms

indexspanish.js

indexspanish.js

988 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1357 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1344 ms

revolution-plugin.js

revolution-plugin.js

1588 ms

rev-script-1.js

rev-script-1.js

1409 ms

css

css

30 ms

css

css

47 ms

css

css

120 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

109 ms

Reliant__Logo%20Color%201.png

Reliant__Logo%20Color%201.png

501 ms

Logo__Reliant.png

Logo__Reliant.png

608 ms

B1.jpg

B1.jpg

1061 ms

B2.jpg

B2.jpg

1063 ms

B3.jpg

B3.jpg

1099 ms

Logo__Reliant_Full.png

Logo__Reliant_Full.png

786 ms

Ree1.png

Ree1.png

902 ms

Ree2.png

Ree2.png

1181 ms

Ree3.png

Ree3.png

2153 ms

FF1.png

FF1.png

1175 ms

FF2.png

FF2.png

1336 ms

FF3.png

FF3.png

1374 ms

FF4.png

FF4.png

1373 ms

FF5.png

FF5.png

1261 ms

FF6.png

FF6.png

1466 ms

FF7.png

FF7.png

1563 ms

FF8.png

FF8.png

1618 ms

Sq.png

Sq.png

1923 ms

W1.png

W1.png

2087 ms

W2.png

W2.png

2111 ms

W3.png

W3.png

2167 ms

W4.png

W4.png

2208 ms

W5.png

W5.png

2557 ms

W6.png

W6.png

2754 ms

W7.png

W7.png

2776 ms

W8.png

W8.png

2809 ms

W9.png

W9.png

2874 ms

32x32.png

32x32.png

178 ms

pub_notice.png

pub_notice.png

2406 ms

font

font

53 ms

font

font

55 ms

font

font

56 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

2620 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

2691 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

3036 ms

R1.png

R1.png

3111 ms

R1.5.png

R1.5.png

2696 ms

F1.png

F1.png

2947 ms

F2.png

F2.png

2959 ms

F3.png

F3.png

2882 ms

F4.png

F4.png

2964 ms

F5.png

F5.png

3000 ms

F6.png

F6.png

3106 ms

F7.png

F7.png

2984 ms

F8.png

F8.png

2877 ms

cta.png

cta.png

2925 ms

Accessibility Review

reliantmanager.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reliantmanager.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

reliantmanager.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reliantmanager.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reliantmanager.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reliantmanager.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reliant Manager. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: