Tools & Wizards About Us
relive.cricket screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

relive.cricket

Relive Cricket-Discover all Cricket in one Place

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

relive.cricket screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Relive content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about relive.cricket

Relive Cricket-Discover all cricket in one Place- App to watch Latest cricket, ICC ODI worldcup 2023, match highlights,ICC worldcup matches, test cricket, T20,ODI, curated collection of golden moments...

Visit relive.cricket

Key Findings

We analyzed Relive.cricket page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

relive.cricket performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

relive.cricket

1234 ms

2c8cec2ba7acb823.css

126 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

82 ms

webpack-ee7e63bc15b31913.js

8 ms

framework-7a7e500878b44665.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Relive.cricket, 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Relive.cricket.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.7 kB (28%)

Content Size

41.7 kB

After Optimization

30.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Relive.cricket main page is 41.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 26.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Relive images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (35%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Relive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

relive.cricket

relive.cricket

1234 ms

2c8cec2ba7acb823.css

2c8cec2ba7acb823.css

126 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

82 ms

webpack-ee7e63bc15b31913.js

webpack-ee7e63bc15b31913.js

8 ms

framework-7a7e500878b44665.js

framework-7a7e500878b44665.js

9 ms

main-31a3515003ac0f70.js

main-31a3515003ac0f70.js

8 ms

_app-7fde60300891cd86.js

_app-7fde60300891cd86.js

23 ms

181-22dac95a7a9d045d.js

181-22dac95a7a9d045d.js

106 ms

index-40812f147f44f507.js

index-40812f147f44f507.js

137 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

11 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

13 ms

rc_new_cwc_logo.svg

rc_new_cwc_logo.svg

14 ms

geton_google_play.webp

geton_google_play.webp

16 ms

cwc_all_winner_pose.webp

cwc_all_winner_pose.webp

131 ms

Google-Logo.webp

Google-Logo.webp

25 ms

Shopify-Logo.svg

Shopify-Logo.svg

28 ms

Cloudflare-Logo.svg

Cloudflare-Logo.svg

34 ms

PayPal-Logo.png

PayPal-Logo.png

171 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

159 ms

rc_cwc_logo_blue.svg

rc_cwc_logo_blue.svg

104 ms

rc_cwc_logo_text_blue.svg

rc_cwc_logo_text_blue.svg

110 ms

css2

css2

25 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

22 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

30 ms

AvenirNext-Bold.svg

AvenirNext-Bold.svg

149 ms

AvenirNext-Regular.svg

AvenirNext-Regular.svg

196 ms

Accessibility Review

relive.cricket accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

relive.cricket best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

relive.cricket SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relive.cricket can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Relive.cricket main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

relive.cricket

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Relive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: