Tools & Wizards About Us
relive.cricket screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

relive.cricket

Relive Cricket-Discover all cricket in one Place

Page Load Speed

770 ms in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

646 ms

Page Rendered

78 ms

relive.cricket screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Relive content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about relive.cricket

Relive Cricket-Discover all cricket in one Place- App to watch Latest cricket, IPL 2024, ICC ODI worldcup 2024, match highlights,ICC worldcup matches, test cricket, T20,ODI, curated collection of gold...

Visit relive.cricket

Key Findings

We analyzed Relive.cricket page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 724 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

relive.cricket performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

relive.cricket

46 ms

relivecricket.web.app

49 ms

3aca6871282fe568.css

235 ms

dc8d7e700bd26fae.css

214 ms

fd9d1056-398cd83444c483ab.js

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Relive.cricket, 81% (17 requests) were made to Relivecricket.web.app and 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (235 ms) relates to the external source Relivecricket.web.app.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.7 kB (39%)

Content Size

50.9 kB

After Optimization

31.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Relive.cricket main page is 50.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 26.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 24.9 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Relive images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (53%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Relive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

relive.cricket

relive.cricket

46 ms

relivecricket.web.app

relivecricket.web.app

49 ms

3aca6871282fe568.css

3aca6871282fe568.css

235 ms

dc8d7e700bd26fae.css

dc8d7e700bd26fae.css

214 ms

fd9d1056-398cd83444c483ab.js

fd9d1056-398cd83444c483ab.js

111 ms

23-c770fcc0a2e66ce6.js

23-c770fcc0a2e66ce6.js

12 ms

main-app-ef171fc148b89edd.js

main-app-ef171fc148b89edd.js

10 ms

b13aaa8a-fe96925dff0e48e7.js

b13aaa8a-fe96925dff0e48e7.js

18 ms

479ba886-5e4cb6eb225f98b0.js

479ba886-5e4cb6eb225f98b0.js

163 ms

961-e775f1f57d386b08.js

961-e775f1f57d386b08.js

212 ms

page-25c6ee02c9627dbc.js

page-25c6ee02c9627dbc.js

21 ms

layout-460b2dff6669df76.js

layout-460b2dff6669df76.js

26 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

29 ms

webpack-f1a42770138bf910.js

webpack-f1a42770138bf910.js

32 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

rc_new_cwc_logo.svg

rc_new_cwc_logo.svg

132 ms

geton_google_play.webp

geton_google_play.webp

119 ms

rc_cwc_logo_blue.svg

rc_cwc_logo_blue.svg

107 ms

rc_cwc_logo_text_blue.svg

rc_cwc_logo_text_blue.svg

88 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

26 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

33 ms

Accessibility Review

relive.cricket accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

relive.cricket best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

relive.cricket SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relive.cricket can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Relive.cricket main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

relive.cricket

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Relive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: