Tools & Wizards About Us
relmark.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

relmark.net

RelMark: Specialty Business Insurance for Fire Sprinkler, Alarm, Contractor Design, and more!

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

610 ms

Page Rendered

319 ms

relmark.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to relmark.net homepage info - get ready to check Rel Mark best content right away, or after learning these important things about relmark.net

RelMark is a versatile insurance program manager and wholesaler for specialty business such as Fire Sprinkler, Alarm Contrator, Contractor Design, and more. Licensed nationally, we have become a valua...

Visit relmark.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Relmark.net page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 929 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

relmark.net performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

relmark.net

117 ms

analytics.js

9 ms

bootstrap.min.css

71 ms

style-min.css

62 ms

font-awesome.min.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Relmark.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) belongs to the original domain Relmark.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

927.1 kB

After Optimization

890.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Relmark.net main page is 927.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 756.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 36.2 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 756.6 kB
  • After minification 756.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rel Mark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 96.5 kB
  • After minification 96.5 kB
  • After compression 92.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 37.8 kB
  • After minification 37.8 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Relmark.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (51%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rel Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

relmark.net

relmark.net

117 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

9 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

71 ms

style-min.css

style-min.css

62 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

57 ms

animate.css

animate.css

80 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

68 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

99 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

85 ms

header.js

header.js

86 ms

prog-nav.js

prog-nav.js

88 ms

app-nav.js

app-nav.js

97 ms

rpg-nav.js

rpg-nav.js

106 ms

footer.js

footer.js

128 ms

collect

collect

40 ms

bg4.jpg

bg4.jpg

153 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

247 ms

old-site.png

old-site.png

246 ms

sprinkler.jpg

sprinkler.jpg

183 ms

alarm.jpg

alarm.jpg

136 ms

portfolio3.jpg

portfolio3.jpg

181 ms

trees.jpg

trees.jpg

152 ms

poolspa.jpg

poolspa.jpg

246 ms

conman.jpg

conman.jpg

245 ms

portfolio7.jpg

portfolio7.jpg

248 ms

fsdesign1.jpg

fsdesign1.jpg

247 ms

worker.jpg

worker.jpg

247 ms

cpvc.jpg

cpvc.jpg

253 ms

increase.jpg

increase.jpg

254 ms

curing.jpg

curing.jpg

268 ms

css

css

17 ms

js

js

91 ms

bg-top.png

bg-top.png

202 ms

logo.png

logo.png

248 ms

font

font

9 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

226 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

201 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

210 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

210 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

224 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

252 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

280 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

303 ms

jquery.easy-pie-chart.js

jquery.easy-pie-chart.js

280 ms

custom.js

custom.js

279 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

321 ms

to-top.png

to-top.png

323 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

159 ms

Accessibility Review

relmark.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

relmark.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

relmark.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relmark.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Relmark.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

relmark.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rel Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: